Comments on: Michelle Obama is not too Proud to Lie

By: Big Dog

Big Dog — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 00:55:25 +0000

Care to point out the areas that are a stretch? You are a typical Obama bot, call names and try to discredit to protect the messiah. Not going to work here. The only joke is Obama and his supporters.

Just like Obambi, you guys try to frame the argument to keep heat off the slug.

By: DXLL

DXLL — Fri, 06 Jun 2008 00:50:02 +0000

wow what a stretch, talk about conjuring up something just to breath the hatred you have in. Any one with any intelligence wouldn’t even consider this a lie. In fact I’d venture to say you’re a liar for making this article seem like its anything valid. Maybe you should try to be a little more intelligent in your fallacies next time. Maybe someone will listen to what you saying. This web site is a joke. LOL!!!!

By: Sandra

Sandra — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 22:21:31 +0000

I am so happy whenever I read someone else realizes these two lie. They feel they are owed the whitehouse and even more so they are lieing to get there. I can’t stomach either one of them. I would love to know the big change they plan on doing and what his plans really are I have heard nothing but beating around the bush. There is nothing anyone can do for years to come after what Bush has done.

What is it that Obama and his wife who has never been a proud american till now because of course what she really meant was playing the black card and a black running for president and he is not the first it is not historic if I recall Jessie Jackson was running.

By: Neocon News » Daily Quick Hits 3/1/08

Neocon News » Daily Quick Hits 3/1/08 — Sun, 02 Mar 2008 08:10:27 +0000

[...] Michelle Obama is not too Proud to Lie [...]

By: Big Dog

Big Dog — Sat, 01 Mar 2008 16:45:30 +0000

Randy, not insane at all. Regardless of what their goal is, she said to not go into the corporate world because it cast too much in education and straps people. By saying to go into other professions she is indicating that it does not cost as much for those degrees. To get a degree or certificate in any profession one is required to go to school and it costs money.

You are the one ignoring the content and that is, she claimed that the only way they made it was Barack’s books and that is a LIE. She made a third of a million dollars a year. No one is saying she should spend a fortune on her kid’s lessons, blah, blah. They are typical liberal elitists and nothing more.

Care to discuss Obama having people removed from the ballots or the NAFTA issue? There are a number of excuses that can be made but the fact is it looks like Obama is involved in typical Chicago style politics. He is not Hope and Change…

By: Randy

Randy — Sat, 01 Mar 2008 00:08:09 +0000

What kind of insane logic are you using? You took a speech that was already cherry picked by the National Review, and drew some crazy conclusion that they didn’t even draw. The Obamas have been quite clear that one of their goals is to make higher education more affordable. That it’s too expensive. To be a teacher or a nurse, you need a degree or certificate. You know that. Michelle Obama NEVER suggested that people shouldn’t go to college because it is too expensive. She suggested that people go into public service, regardess of the fact that it doesn’t pay as well. The reason: We need teachers. We need public servants. NEVER did she suggest that anyone shouldn’t go to college. It doesn’t even say that in the National Review article.

P.S. As a long time Chicago resident, I feel obligated to correct Big Lizard on a couple of points. Blair Hull was an inc**bent of the Illinois Democratic machine. He was endorsed in the primary by the grandaddy of that machine, Mayor Daley. Barack Obama beat him DESPITE the machine. Jack Ryan? There is no one there to blame except for the national Republican party. Obama was against the divorce records being released, and criticized their release when they came out. It was the Republican party that pressured Ryan to drop out of the race (due to some moral superiority they wanted to display) and who then replaced him with Alan Keyes. It seems completely irrational to me that they would do that, but they did. Funny thing is: Ryan was already losing in the polls, but still had a fighting chance despite the divorce records being released. He definately would have done better than Keyes. The Republican party has only themselves to blame for losing that race.

By: Raven

Raven — Fri, 29 Feb 2008 23:44:03 +0000

WAAAAAAAAAH

I can’t stand it when rich people pretend to be anything BUT. The Obama’s remind me of the Edwards…just average everyday people right?

NOT. They live in a mansion. They choose to spend/waste 10,000 a yr per kid on pIaNo and dAnCe lessons- skills the kids will really need in life, right?

I call BS. These people are wealthy and have no place speaking like they are anything but that.
The hypocrisy smells so bad I need a fan and open windows.