<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maryland Will Violate Rights to Get DNA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onebigdog.net/maryland-will-violate-rights-to-get-dna/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/maryland-will-violate-rights-to-get-dna/</link>
	<description>"Let that be a lesson to you, boys and girls. Don't ever argue with the Big Dog because the Big Dog is always right"</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:27:03 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Dog</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/maryland-will-violate-rights-to-get-dna/comment-page-1/#comment-94732</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/maryland-will-violate-rights-to-get-dna/#comment-94732</guid>
		<description>This is from The leadership council on child abuse and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.leadershipcouncil.org/1/res/rcd.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;interpersonal violence&lt;/a&gt;

The vast majority of sex offenses are never reported. For instance, the National Women&#039;s Study surveyed a representative sample of over 4,000 adult women in the United States . Three hundred forty-one (8.5%) of these women were victims of at least one rape prior to the age of 18; however, only 11.9% of these women reported the rape to authorities (Hanson et al., 1990). And it must be remembered, of the few offenses reported, an even smaller number result in convictions.

The problem with using recidivism rates to determine the rate of reoffending is readily apparent when considering the following example. If 100% of released molesters reoffended, but the rate of reporting is only 12%, and the conviction rate is half of this, than the recidivism rate would be reported as only 6%!

Prentky et al. (1997) examined recidivism rates on 115 child molesters and concluded that: (1) child molesters remain at risk to reoffend long after their discharge, in some cases 15-20 years after discharge; (2) there is a marked underestimation of recidivism rates.

Likewise, a review by the American Psychological Association (2003) concluded that &quot;the research demonstrates that even sexual offenses against children that occurred long ago evince a continuing risk of recidivism by the offender.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is from The leadership council on child abuse and <a href="http://www.leadershipcouncil.org/1/res/rcd.html" rel="nofollow">interpersonal violence</a></p>
<p>The vast majority of sex offenses are never reported. For instance, the National Women&#8217;s Study surveyed a representative sample of over 4,000 adult women in the United States . Three hundred forty-one (8.5%) of these women were victims of at least one rape prior to the age of 18; however, only 11.9% of these women reported the rape to authorities (Hanson et al., 1990). And it must be remembered, of the few offenses reported, an even smaller number result in convictions.</p>
<p>The problem with using recidivism rates to determine the rate of reoffending is readily apparent when considering the following example. If 100% of released molesters reoffended, but the rate of reporting is only 12%, and the conviction rate is half of this, than the recidivism rate would be reported as only 6%!</p>
<p>Prentky et al. (1997) examined recidivism rates on 115 child molesters and concluded that: (1) child molesters remain at risk to reoffend long after their discharge, in some cases 15-20 years after discharge; (2) there is a marked underestimation of recidivism rates.</p>
<p>Likewise, a review by the American Psychological Association (2003) concluded that &#8220;the research demonstrates that even sexual offenses against children that occurred long ago evince a continuing risk of recidivism by the offender.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Dog</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/maryland-will-violate-rights-to-get-dna/comment-page-1/#comment-94728</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/maryland-will-violate-rights-to-get-dna/#comment-94728</guid>
		<description>As your data suggests, many sex crimes are not reported.  Child sex offenders continue to commit sex crimes with children until they are caught so there are multiple offenses.

There is a difference between recidivism and reconviction.  As we know, many offenders are caught and released or not convicted but that does not mean they did not commit the crime.

Adults (particularly men) who have sex with children are not cured just because they served time in jail and this is why they are not allowed near children and must register.  A murderer does not have to register if released but a sex offender does because they will do it again.

All child sex offenders will offend again if given the opportunity.  They should be sent to jail for life.

As for the facts vs myths that is all well and good and I suppose that we can do anything with numbers.  You present this as if sex offenders (especially child sex offenders) are misunderstood and we should understand them.  I think they should be jailed for life and if one ever molested my child or grandchild I would kill the bastard myself.

I hope that gives YOU the facts.  Keep the freaks in jail and away from kids and they won&#039;t get killed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As your data suggests, many sex crimes are not reported.  Child sex offenders continue to commit sex crimes with children until they are caught so there are multiple offenses.</p>
<p>There is a difference between recidivism and reconviction.  As we know, many offenders are caught and released or not convicted but that does not mean they did not commit the crime.</p>
<p>Adults (particularly men) who have sex with children are not cured just because they served time in jail and this is why they are not allowed near children and must register.  A murderer does not have to register if released but a sex offender does because they will do it again.</p>
<p>All child sex offenders will offend again if given the opportunity.  They should be sent to jail for life.</p>
<p>As for the facts vs myths that is all well and good and I suppose that we can do anything with numbers.  You present this as if sex offenders (especially child sex offenders) are misunderstood and we should understand them.  I think they should be jailed for life and if one ever molested my child or grandchild I would kill the bastard myself.</p>
<p>I hope that gives YOU the facts.  Keep the freaks in jail and away from kids and they won&#8217;t get killed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: khansgod01</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/maryland-will-violate-rights-to-get-dna/comment-page-1/#comment-94718</link>
		<dc:creator>khansgod01</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/maryland-will-violate-rights-to-get-dna/#comment-94718</guid>
		<description>A little eye opener for ya &quot;Big Puppy&quot;... the facts!!


http://www.csom.org/pubs/mythsfacts.html

There are many misconceptions about sexual offenses, sexual offense victims, and sex offenders in our society. Much has been learned about these behaviors and populations in the past decade and this information is being used to develop more effective criminal justice interventions throughout the country. This document serves to inform citizens, policy makers, and practitioners about sex offenders and their victims, addressing the facts that underlie common assumptions both true and false in this rapidly evolving field.

Myth:
&quot;Most sex offenders reoffend.&quot;

Fact:
Reconviction data suggest that this is not the case. Further, reoffense rates vary among different types of sex offenders and are related to specific characteristics of the offender and the offense.

Persons who commit sex offenses are not a homogeneous group, but instead fall into several different categories. As a result, research has identified significant differences in reoffense patterns from one category to another. Looking at reconviction rates alone, one large-scale analysis (Hanson and Bussiere, 1998) reported the following differences:

  # child molesters had a 13% reconviction rate for sexual offenses and a 37% reconviction rate for new, non-sex offenses over a five year period; and
  # rapists had a 19% reconviction rate for sexual offenses and a 46% reconviction rate for new, non-sexual offenses over a five year period.

Another study found reconviction rates for child molesters to be 20% and for rapists to be approximately 23% (Quinsey, Rice, and Harris, 1995).

Individual characteristics of the crimes further distinguish recidivism rates. For instance, victim gender and relation to the offender have been found to impact recidivism rates. In a 1995 study, researchers found that offenders who had extrafamilial female victims had a recidivism rate of 18% and those who had extrafamilial male victims recidivated at a rate of 35%. This same study found a recidivism rate for incest offenders to be approximately 9% (Quinsey, Rice, and Harris, 1995).

It is noteworthy that recidivism rates for sex offenders are lower than for the general criminal population. For example, one study of 108,580 non-sex criminals released from prisons in 11 states in 1983 found that nearly 63% were rearrested for a non-sexual felony or serious misdemeanor within three years of their release from incarceration; 47% were reconvicted; and 41% were ultimately returned to prison or jail (Bureau of Justice Statistics).

It is important to note that not all sex crimes are solved or result in arrest and only a fraction of sex offenses are reported to police. The reliance on measures of recidivism as reflected through official criminal justice system data (i.e., rearrest or reconviction rates) obviously omits offenses that are not cleared through an arrest (and thereby cannot be attributed to any individual offender) or those that are never reported to the police. For a variety of reasons, many victims of sexual assault are reluctant to invoke the criminal justice process and do not report their victimization to the police. For these reasons, relying on rearrest and reconviction data underestimates actual reoffense numbers.

Contact

Center for Sex Offender Management
8403 Colesville Rd., Suite 720
Silver Spring, MD 20910
Phone: (301) 589-9383
Fax: (301) 589-3505
E-mail: askcsom@csom.org
Internet: www.csom.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A little eye opener for ya &#8220;Big Puppy&#8221;&#8230; the facts!!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.csom.org/pubs/mythsfacts.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.csom.org/pubs/mythsfacts.html</a></p>
<p>There are many misconceptions about sexual offenses, sexual offense victims, and sex offenders in our society. Much has been learned about these behaviors and populations in the past decade and this information is being used to develop more effective criminal justice interventions throughout the country. This document serves to inform citizens, policy makers, and practitioners about sex offenders and their victims, addressing the facts that underlie common assumptions both true and false in this rapidly evolving field.</p>
<p>Myth:<br />
&#8220;Most sex offenders reoffend.&#8221;</p>
<p>Fact:<br />
Reconviction data suggest that this is not the case. Further, reoffense rates vary among different types of sex offenders and are related to specific characteristics of the offender and the offense.</p>
<p>Persons who commit sex offenses are not a homogeneous group, but instead fall into several different categories. As a result, research has identified significant differences in reoffense patterns from one category to another. Looking at reconviction rates alone, one large-scale analysis (Hanson and Bussiere, 1998) reported the following differences:</p>
<p>  # child molesters had a 13% reconviction rate for sexual offenses and a 37% reconviction rate for new, non-sex offenses over a five year period; and<br />
  # rapists had a 19% reconviction rate for sexual offenses and a 46% reconviction rate for new, non-sexual offenses over a five year period.</p>
<p>Another study found reconviction rates for child molesters to be 20% and for rapists to be approximately 23% (Quinsey, Rice, and Harris, 1995).</p>
<p>Individual characteristics of the crimes further distinguish recidivism rates. For instance, victim gender and relation to the offender have been found to impact recidivism rates. In a 1995 study, researchers found that offenders who had extrafamilial female victims had a recidivism rate of 18% and those who had extrafamilial male victims recidivated at a rate of 35%. This same study found a recidivism rate for incest offenders to be approximately 9% (Quinsey, Rice, and Harris, 1995).</p>
<p>It is noteworthy that recidivism rates for sex offenders are lower than for the general criminal population. For example, one study of 108,580 non-sex criminals released from prisons in 11 states in 1983 found that nearly 63% were rearrested for a non-sexual felony or serious misdemeanor within three years of their release from incarceration; 47% were reconvicted; and 41% were ultimately returned to prison or jail (Bureau of Justice Statistics).</p>
<p>It is important to note that not all sex crimes are solved or result in arrest and only a fraction of sex offenses are reported to police. The reliance on measures of recidivism as reflected through official criminal justice system data (i.e., rearrest or reconviction rates) obviously omits offenses that are not cleared through an arrest (and thereby cannot be attributed to any individual offender) or those that are never reported to the police. For a variety of reasons, many victims of sexual assault are reluctant to invoke the criminal justice process and do not report their victimization to the police. For these reasons, relying on rearrest and reconviction data underestimates actual reoffense numbers.</p>
<p>Contact</p>
<p>Center for Sex Offender Management<br />
8403 Colesville Rd., Suite 720<br />
Silver Spring, MD 20910<br />
Phone: (301) 589-9383<br />
Fax: (301) 589-3505<br />
E-mail: <a href="mailto:askcsom@csom.org">askcsom@csom.org</a><br />
Internet: <a href="http://www.csom.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.csom.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pauls lane</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/maryland-will-violate-rights-to-get-dna/comment-page-1/#comment-94505</link>
		<dc:creator>pauls lane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:55:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/maryland-will-violate-rights-to-get-dna/#comment-94505</guid>
		<description>Big Dog - I am not really disagreeing with you, but isn&#039;t it true that if you are arrested for a crime and later found not guilty you can petition the court to have everything (fingerprints, court records, police records, court transcripts, detention center records, witness statements) removed?  As if it never happened.  Wouldn&#039;t the same hold true for DNA?  Of course one would have to have faith that the government will do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big Dog &#8211; I am not really disagreeing with you, but isn&#8217;t it true that if you are arrested for a crime and later found not guilty you can petition the court to have everything (fingerprints, court records, police records, court transcripts, detention center records, witness statements) removed?  As if it never happened.  Wouldn&#8217;t the same hold true for DNA?  Of course one would have to have faith that the government will do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

