Comments on: Junk Science And The Himalayan Glacier

By: Blake

Blake — Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:50:13 +0000

They had to make it public- or else they look like bigger fools than they already are- and that is hard to do.

By: Blake

Blake — Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:39:18 +0000

I love it when an AGW symp has to say, “OOPS!”
Glaciers melt because that is a part of what glaciers do.
I look forward to a longer growing season.

By: Darrel

Darrel — Tue, 19 Jan 2010 01:55:27 +0000

The Times UK was your source, and as has been shown, it is a very dishonest source on the topic of climate change.

By: Big Dog

Big Dog — Mon, 18 Jan 2010 21:55:15 +0000

I don’t know Adam, maybe the closer scrutiny after the emails exposing the hoax these folks decided that they should fess up. They just noticed that they attributed something to a little known source.

Darrel, the Times UK is not the source, they are reporting it.

By: Darrel

Darrel — Mon, 18 Jan 2010 21:44:43 +0000

KLERN: Why are these scientists only speaking up now?>>

DAR
Just found out?

KLERN: It’s been two years since the UN IPCC made these false statements.>>

DAR
What “false statements?” Be specific.

By: Klem

Klem — Mon, 18 Jan 2010 19:35:46 +0000

I’ll bet with a little investigation, it will be shown that this is not the only time the UN IPCC has done this.

Why are these scientists only speaking up now? It’s been two years since the UN IPCC made these false statements. Why is it that only after Copenehagen does anyone have the backbone to say anything?

By: Darrel

Darrel — Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:05:55 +0000

And he talks about poor sources and then appeals to The Times UK, those fellows who put out that stinking pile of lies and distortions (completely refuted by the people they quoted) last week.

D.
————-
“The past year, 2009, tied as the second warmest year in the 130 years of global instrumental temperature records, in the surface temperature analysis of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS). The Southern Hemisphere set a record as the warmest year for that half of the world.”

2009 temperatures by Jim Hansen

See charts at the link.

By: Adam

Adam — Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:28:58 +0000

You forgot to mention this part:

Perhaps its one consolation is that the blunder was spotted by climate scientists who quickly made it public.

You look at that article and say:

Those global warming alarmists will do anything to push their hoax.

I look at that article and say this is peer reviewed science at work. Finding flaws in research is not a big deal. It’s only a big deal when those flaws are hidden or ignored. This is like NASA correcting it’s data which many of you deniers seem to think is evidence of fraud. It’s not. This isn’t the first or the last thing that will change from one IPCC report to another. That’s why it’s science.

The glaciers are melting because of climate change, that much is not in question. This is another thing you forgot to mention.