<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Wimpy Banned, Too?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onebigdog.net/is-wimpy-banned-too/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/is-wimpy-banned-too/</link>
	<description>"Let that be a lesson to you, boys and girls. Don't ever argue with the Big Dog because the Big Dog is always right"</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:42:29 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/is-wimpy-banned-too/comment-page-1/#comment-136353</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 11:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=7724#comment-136353</guid>
		<description>Context, Darrel- always remember the context.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Context, Darrel- always remember the context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrel</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/is-wimpy-banned-too/comment-page-1/#comment-136303</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 01:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=7724#comment-136303</guid>
		<description>Bigd: &quot;who is saying that the slippery slope is not a logical fallacy?&quot;

DAR
  Blake. See above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bigd: &#8220;who is saying that the slippery slope is not a logical fallacy?&#8221;</p>
<p>DAR<br />
  Blake. See above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Dog</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/is-wimpy-banned-too/comment-page-1/#comment-136053</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 02:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=7724#comment-136053</guid>
		<description>So who is saying that the slippery slope is not a logical fallacy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So who is saying that the slippery slope is not a logical fallacy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/is-wimpy-banned-too/comment-page-1/#comment-136027</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 15:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=7724#comment-136027</guid>
		<description>I speak of you D- you really need to associate with something other than your goats- they&#039;re just not open- minded enough for you to see the big picture- you see no problem, which is why when we have to haul your butt out of the fire, I WILL expect a thank you, because you are willfully ignoring signs that our Republic is in dire trouble from these thugs now, and if we wait too long, we will have that much more difficult a time dislodging these parasites from our government- AND other nations will seek to exploit our troubles.
It could end up where the memories of Hussein are comparable to the last days of Mussolini. No one wants that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I speak of you D- you really need to associate with something other than your goats- they&#8217;re just not open- minded enough for you to see the big picture- you see no problem, which is why when we have to haul your butt out of the fire, I WILL expect a thank you, because you are willfully ignoring signs that our Republic is in dire trouble from these thugs now, and if we wait too long, we will have that much more difficult a time dislodging these parasites from our government- AND other nations will seek to exploit our troubles.<br />
It could end up where the memories of Hussein are comparable to the last days of Mussolini. No one wants that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrel</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/is-wimpy-banned-too/comment-page-1/#comment-136025</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 15:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=7724#comment-136025</guid>
		<description>BLK: &quot;“slippery slope is a logical fallacy”- not so.&quot;&gt;&gt;

DAR
The a slippery slope argument is a classical informal fallacy.

BLK: &quot;there will always be ignorant people. hat’s[sic] just a fact.&gt;&gt;

DAR
  Indeed.

D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BLK: &#8220;“slippery slope is a logical fallacy”- not so.&#8221;&gt;&gt;</p>
<p>DAR<br />
The a slippery slope argument is a classical informal fallacy.</p>
<p>BLK: &#8220;there will always be ignorant people. hat’s[sic] just a fact.&gt;&gt;</p>
<p>DAR<br />
  Indeed.</p>
<p>D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Dog</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/is-wimpy-banned-too/comment-page-1/#comment-135985</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 04:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=7724#comment-135985</guid>
		<description>So they could not vote.  That was then and this is now.  They caught up and in many cases have set asides under affirmative action.  Minority and women owned businesses get unfair advantages in the government contracting process.

My heritage is Indian and our land was taken from us and we were killed.  It happened.  I would not go around saying I got a bad deal because of it.

No matter what the feminists and the metrosexuals say, men and women are different.  There are reasons for the difference.  As a group men are stronger than women.  Just a pure fact.  Women are superior to men in some things men superior to women in others which is why a man and woman together makes a formidable team.  They are a synergistic existence...

In any event, our society has changed and women have equal rights as they should but I refuse to keep up this charade about needed to have all kinds of programs because some real old women could not vote when they were young just like i refuse to play the game about slavery when no one who is alive was a slave or owned one.

But along the equality lines, women have to do less on a physical fitness test to get into the Service Academies.  Men have to do more for the same benefit.

Men have to do more than women to pass fitness tests in the Army (and I am sure the rest of the services) which means two people, one man, one woman of equal time and grade will get the  exact same pay.  Except the woman does not have to do as much to earn hers.

And women cannot be drafted.  Should we change this at the same time we are increasing the phyisical fitness standards so they have to do as much as men?

And this is the case in police departments and fire departments as well...

You brought it up so I thought I would address it.  I understand the reason that these things take place and have no problem with it.  I am just saying that if you insist on every damned thing being exactly equal then I demand that they be equal in what I have discussed and they must be equal up to the standards men now have and not allow the men&#039;s standards to be lowered to accommodate women.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So they could not vote.  That was then and this is now.  They caught up and in many cases have set asides under affirmative action.  Minority and women owned businesses get unfair advantages in the government contracting process.</p>
<p>My heritage is Indian and our land was taken from us and we were killed.  It happened.  I would not go around saying I got a bad deal because of it.</p>
<p>No matter what the feminists and the metrosexuals say, men and women are different.  There are reasons for the difference.  As a group men are stronger than women.  Just a pure fact.  Women are superior to men in some things men superior to women in others which is why a man and woman together makes a formidable team.  They are a synergistic existence&#8230;</p>
<p>In any event, our society has changed and women have equal rights as they should but I refuse to keep up this charade about needed to have all kinds of programs because some real old women could not vote when they were young just like i refuse to play the game about slavery when no one who is alive was a slave or owned one.</p>
<p>But along the equality lines, women have to do less on a physical fitness test to get into the Service Academies.  Men have to do more for the same benefit.</p>
<p>Men have to do more than women to pass fitness tests in the Army (and I am sure the rest of the services) which means two people, one man, one woman of equal time and grade will get the  exact same pay.  Except the woman does not have to do as much to earn hers.</p>
<p>And women cannot be drafted.  Should we change this at the same time we are increasing the phyisical fitness standards so they have to do as much as men?</p>
<p>And this is the case in police departments and fire departments as well&#8230;</p>
<p>You brought it up so I thought I would address it.  I understand the reason that these things take place and have no problem with it.  I am just saying that if you insist on every damned thing being exactly equal then I demand that they be equal in what I have discussed and they must be equal up to the standards men now have and not allow the men&#8217;s standards to be lowered to accommodate women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Dog</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/is-wimpy-banned-too/comment-page-1/#comment-135984</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 04:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=7724#comment-135984</guid>
		<description>To counter racial and sex (more appropriate than gender which deals more with grammar)  stereotypes?  The intent of what is said has to be taken into account.  If you say someone was blackballed it has nothing to do with race.  It has to do with a voting process in which a white ball is yes and a black one no.  In organizations where you are voted in some require all white balls to get in.  If you don&#039;t make it they say you were black balled.  How does that have a racial component?

Like white in rice means very close to so how is that racial?

Some of the proposed changes are stupid.  I can see where chairman is outdated though the word man could men the sex or mankind which covers women (remember that man and men is part of woMAN and woMEN).  Chairperson is OK but some stuff they do is stupid.  Calling the kettle black is not racial.

Are we to take all references to color out of our language because someone might get offended.  No green with jealousy because you might be talking about green card immigrants.  No red with rage because Indians might get upset.  No feeling blue because those blue guys who throw marshmallows into each other&#039;s mouths might get upset...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To counter racial and sex (more appropriate than gender which deals more with grammar)  stereotypes?  The intent of what is said has to be taken into account.  If you say someone was blackballed it has nothing to do with race.  It has to do with a voting process in which a white ball is yes and a black one no.  In organizations where you are voted in some require all white balls to get in.  If you don&#8217;t make it they say you were black balled.  How does that have a racial component?</p>
<p>Like white in rice means very close to so how is that racial?</p>
<p>Some of the proposed changes are stupid.  I can see where chairman is outdated though the word man could men the sex or mankind which covers women (remember that man and men is part of woMAN and woMEN).  Chairperson is OK but some stuff they do is stupid.  Calling the kettle black is not racial.</p>
<p>Are we to take all references to color out of our language because someone might get offended.  No green with jealousy because you might be talking about green card immigrants.  No red with rage because Indians might get upset.  No feeling blue because those blue guys who throw marshmallows into each other&#8217;s mouths might get upset&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Dog</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/is-wimpy-banned-too/comment-page-1/#comment-135983</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 03:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=7724#comment-135983</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think there is a stereotype if race is mentioned in a BOLO.  The race baiters get up in arms and scream racism but if they said the suspect was a white male then you could ignore all females and black males.  If they said it was a black woman you could ignore all men and white women.  Color is a description and skin color is as important as hair color and eye color when giving a description of a suspect.

Only a moron would NOT give the race of the person they were looking for.

Funny though, in Baltimore they stopped the race thing in BOLOs because of griping from the race baiters.  Then the beltway snipers started shooting people.  The police said the perps were likely white.  There was no outcry, the police and public were looking for a white guy in a panel van because that was the profile.  They ignored black men in cars at roadblocks and let them pass through but stopped white guys, especially panel vans.  The beltway snipers, two black men, drove through one such roadblock because they were not the right color to be stopped.

I point that out to show how color is important in describing (when you actuall have an eye witness or a video and not some profile) but also that there was no outcry when white was used in the description...

Yes some stereotypes are true of some people.  We have these stereotypes because the behavior has been demonstrated enough to give that impression.  Many are just narrow minded, bigoted thinking but some are true.  And we all stereotype.  Look at how you stereotype conservatives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think there is a stereotype if race is mentioned in a BOLO.  The race baiters get up in arms and scream racism but if they said the suspect was a white male then you could ignore all females and black males.  If they said it was a black woman you could ignore all men and white women.  Color is a description and skin color is as important as hair color and eye color when giving a description of a suspect.</p>
<p>Only a moron would NOT give the race of the person they were looking for.</p>
<p>Funny though, in Baltimore they stopped the race thing in BOLOs because of griping from the race baiters.  Then the beltway snipers started shooting people.  The police said the perps were likely white.  There was no outcry, the police and public were looking for a white guy in a panel van because that was the profile.  They ignored black men in cars at roadblocks and let them pass through but stopped white guys, especially panel vans.  The beltway snipers, two black men, drove through one such roadblock because they were not the right color to be stopped.</p>
<p>I point that out to show how color is important in describing (when you actuall have an eye witness or a video and not some profile) but also that there was no outcry when white was used in the description&#8230;</p>
<p>Yes some stereotypes are true of some people.  We have these stereotypes because the behavior has been demonstrated enough to give that impression.  Many are just narrow minded, bigoted thinking but some are true.  And we all stereotype.  Look at how you stereotype conservatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/is-wimpy-banned-too/comment-page-1/#comment-135962</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=7724#comment-135962</guid>
		<description>You will find this is prevalent in newspapers also- you are not told what race a suspect is- unless there&#039;s a picture.
Quite annoying, and never informative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You will find this is prevalent in newspapers also- you are not told what race a suspect is- unless there&#8217;s a picture.<br />
Quite annoying, and never informative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/is-wimpy-banned-too/comment-page-1/#comment-135956</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 09:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=7724#comment-135956</guid>
		<description>Its a PC thing, where people are afraid to even mention race- a factor that is actually very pertinent in finding the perp and not nabbing the wrong gut.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its a PC thing, where people are afraid to even mention race- a factor that is actually very pertinent in finding the perp and not nabbing the wrong gut.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.501 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-11 01:05:20 -->

