Comments on: I Thought We Lost No Information From Underwear Bomber http://www.onebigdog.net/i-thought-we-lost-no-information-from-underwear-bomber/ "Let that be a lesson to you, boys and girls. Don't ever argue with the Big Dog because the Big Dog is always right" Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:27:03 -0500 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Big Dog http://www.onebigdog.net/i-thought-we-lost-no-information-from-underwear-bomber/comment-page-1/#comment-147557 Big Dog Sat, 06 Feb 2010 04:48:13 +0000 http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=8966#comment-147557 He worked as hard as he could to obtain power and some of it was legal. When it comes to power he will do anything, when it comes to national security he is weak. He does not care because he has armed people around him all the time. He worked as hard as he could to obtain power and some of it was legal.

When it comes to power he will do anything, when it comes to national security he is weak.

He does not care because he has armed people around him all the time.

]]> By: Darrel http://www.onebigdog.net/i-thought-we-lost-no-information-from-underwear-bomber/comment-page-1/#comment-147550 Darrel Sat, 06 Feb 2010 02:31:07 +0000 http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=8966#comment-147550 BLK: "O-... is the guy that reflexively hands over his lunch money at the first sign of a possible conflict.">> DAR How did he do in that big honking "conflict" with McCain? BLK: “O-… is the guy that reflexively hands over his lunch money at the first sign of a possible conflict.”>>

DAR
How did he do in that big honking “conflict” with McCain?

]]> By: Blake http://www.onebigdog.net/i-thought-we-lost-no-information-from-underwear-bomber/comment-page-1/#comment-147506 Blake Fri, 05 Feb 2010 16:39:09 +0000 http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=8966#comment-147506 What you said, Adam- the O is weak as dishwater, and the attack that will come WILL be the fault of the O- he is the guy that reflexively hands over his lunch money at the first sign of a possible conflict. To call him a coward is to do cowards a disservice. What you said, Adam- the O is weak as dishwater, and the attack that will come WILL be the fault of the O- he is the guy that reflexively hands over his lunch money at the first sign of a possible conflict.
To call him a coward is to do cowards a disservice.

]]> By: Adam http://www.onebigdog.net/i-thought-we-lost-no-information-from-underwear-bomber/comment-page-1/#comment-147452 Adam Thu, 04 Feb 2010 12:13:06 +0000 http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=8966#comment-147452 What is nice is that Big Dog is admitting that information is still coming out, even with Miranda warnings. Yet he's still talking the doom and gloom and saying a terrorist attack is eminent and it will be 121% the fault of Obama and the Democrats because he's an appeaser and weak on national security, whatever that means. I guess when you talk tough and wear a cowboy hat like Bush then you get a pass on all the terrorist attacks on the country and you get to blame that on anyone but Bush. Because Bush wasn't an appeaser, no sir. What is nice is that Big Dog is admitting that information is still coming out, even with Miranda warnings. Yet he’s still talking the doom and gloom and saying a terrorist attack is eminent and it will be 121% the fault of Obama and the Democrats because he’s an appeaser and weak on national security, whatever that means.

I guess when you talk tough and wear a cowboy hat like Bush then you get a pass on all the terrorist attacks on the country and you get to blame that on anyone but Bush. Because Bush wasn’t an appeaser, no sir.

]]> By: Darrel http://www.onebigdog.net/i-thought-we-lost-no-information-from-underwear-bomber/comment-page-1/#comment-147446 Darrel Thu, 04 Feb 2010 05:20:10 +0000 http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=8966#comment-147446 "information was lost because of the Miranda warning." DAR Why should anyone believe that? You do remember that these Miranda warnings began under GW Bush? “information was lost because of the Miranda warning.”

DAR
Why should anyone believe that?

You do remember that these Miranda warnings began under GW Bush?

]]> By: Darrel http://www.onebigdog.net/i-thought-we-lost-no-information-from-underwear-bomber/comment-page-1/#comment-147413 Darrel Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:44:41 +0000 http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=8966#comment-147413 Today? Today?

]]> By: Adam http://www.onebigdog.net/i-thought-we-lost-no-information-from-underwear-bomber/comment-page-1/#comment-147405 Adam Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:38:01 +0000 http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=8966#comment-147405 Under GOP terror ball rules Obama inherited any terrorist attack anyway. So let's just get it out of the way and blame Bush for any future terrorism. We'll dig out the photos of Obama people carrying memos saying how the attack was probably going to happen and we'll just still say "No one could have known this..." Oh, I know. We'll pretend the attack never happened. That's GOP standard too. Bush kept us 100% safe from terrorism didn't he? That means Obama gets at least 2 or 3 more attacks, one of them major, and he'll still have a clean record on terrorism. Weak on national security? Appeasing the enemy? You're a talking points machine today, aren't you? Under GOP terror ball rules Obama inherited any terrorist attack anyway. So let’s just get it out of the way and blame Bush for any future terrorism. We’ll dig out the photos of Obama people carrying memos saying how the attack was probably going to happen and we’ll just still say “No one could have known this…”

Oh, I know. We’ll pretend the attack never happened. That’s GOP standard too. Bush kept us 100% safe from terrorism didn’t he? That means Obama gets at least 2 or 3 more attacks, one of them major, and he’ll still have a clean record on terrorism.

Weak on national security? Appeasing the enemy? You’re a talking points machine today, aren’t you?

]]> By: Macker http://www.onebigdog.net/i-thought-we-lost-no-information-from-underwear-bomber/comment-page-1/#comment-147402 Macker Wed, 03 Feb 2010 10:41:38 +0000 http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=8966#comment-147402 Gee, do you think the guy wants to <b>LIVE?</b> Gee, do you think the guy wants to LIVE?

]]>