I Thought We Lost No Information From Underwear Bomber

The Obama administration mishandled the Fruit of the Boom bomber by giving him Miranda Rights, at which point he “lawyered up.” He stopped talking and we did not get any more information from him even though he had earlier indicated that others would follow him. The administration says that we did not lose any information because he had stopped talking by the time they read him “his” rights.

Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab was read his Miranda rights, but that was only after he had been detained, questioned for almost an hour, and had stopped talking. In other words, no information was lost because of the Miranda warning. Representatives of the Justice Department, the CIA and the FBI had a teleconference where they all signed off taking this action. Alan Colmes

Interestingly, this guy must have had more to say because he is now talking. In other words, information was lost because of the Miranda warning. Despite the assertion posted at Colmes’ site, the Nigerian is now talking and providing more information:

The Nigerian man accused of trying to use a bomb hidden in his underwear to bring down a Detroit-bound airliner on Christmas has been cooperating with investigators since last week and has provided fresh intelligence in multiple terrorism investigations, officials said Tuesday. FOX News

Even though liberal shill Colmes posted this just yesterday, the indication is that the Fruit of the Boom bomber has been talking.

Maybe he got a deal of some sort but whatever the reason, the Miranda prevented us from getting this information sooner.

We will likely be attacked within the next year or so and we will have the Democrats to hold accountable. They are weak on national security and Obama is too busy appeasing the enemy to see what is going on.

I hope this mishandling does not lead to an attack that could have been prevented but if it does there should be hell to pay.

Big Dog

Gunline

If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.



Print This Post

If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.

8 Responses to “I Thought We Lost No Information From Underwear Bomber”

  1. Macker says:

    Gee, do you think the guy wants to LIVE?

  2. Adam says:

    Under GOP terror ball rules Obama inherited any terrorist attack anyway. So let’s just get it out of the way and blame Bush for any future terrorism. We’ll dig out the photos of Obama people carrying memos saying how the attack was probably going to happen and we’ll just still say “No one could have known this…”

    Oh, I know. We’ll pretend the attack never happened. That’s GOP standard too. Bush kept us 100% safe from terrorism didn’t he? That means Obama gets at least 2 or 3 more attacks, one of them major, and he’ll still have a clean record on terrorism.

    Weak on national security? Appeasing the enemy? You’re a talking points machine today, aren’t you?

  3. Darrel says:

    “information was lost because of the Miranda warning.”

    DAR
    Why should anyone believe that?

    You do remember that these Miranda warnings began under GW Bush?

    • Adam says:

      What is nice is that Big Dog is admitting that information is still coming out, even with Miranda warnings. Yet he’s still talking the doom and gloom and saying a terrorist attack is eminent and it will be 121% the fault of Obama and the Democrats because he’s an appeaser and weak on national security, whatever that means.

      I guess when you talk tough and wear a cowboy hat like Bush then you get a pass on all the terrorist attacks on the country and you get to blame that on anyone but Bush. Because Bush wasn’t an appeaser, no sir.

      • Blake says:

        What you said, Adam- the O is weak as dishwater, and the attack that will come WILL be the fault of the O- he is the guy that reflexively hands over his lunch money at the first sign of a possible conflict.
        To call him a coward is to do cowards a disservice.

      • Darrel says:

        BLK: “O-… is the guy that reflexively hands over his lunch money at the first sign of a possible conflict.”>>

        DAR
        How did he do in that big honking “conflict” with McCain?

        • Big Dog says:

          He worked as hard as he could to obtain power and some of it was legal.

          When it comes to power he will do anything, when it comes to national security he is weak.

          He does not care because he has armed people around him all the time.