How Democrats Plan To Win – Cheat

The Democrats are pulling out all the stops to win next Tuesday but things are still looking rough and they are likely in for a long night. But that is not to say they are throwing in the towel. They have an ace in the hole, or up their sleeves, as it were.

They plan to cheat. There is no other way to put it, they plan to cheat.

We already have evidence in the Florida Governor’s race. Alex Sink broke the rules to which she agreed in her debate and read a note from her make-up person. Candidates signed an agreement not to get notes during the debate but during a commercial Sink’s make-up artist brought her an electronic device with a message from an aide.

Sink read the message instead of shooing the person away and telling her it was against the rules. Sink only addressed the issue after she was outed by her opponent, Rick Scott.

Then we have early voting, where in several states the machines have been doing things to benefit Democrats.

In Nevada the polling machines already have Harry Reid’s name selected when the voter puts a voting card into the machine. This is one way to steal the election, program the machines to select the candidate the Democrats want.

Nevada is not the only place. In Craven County, North Carolina, the machines select the entire Democrat ticket when voters slect the button to vote the entire Republican ticket. Voters who select the button to vote the Republican party are seeing the screen come back with all Democrats selected. This happened several times after a voter cleared the screen and tried again.

Cheating and stealing elections is their specialty. In the Democrat party the dead and the illegals are allowed to vote right alongside the felons.

After Ted Kennedy, Robert Byrd, and John Murtha died, they were removed from the rolls of Congress and placed on the voter rolls in Chicago.

That is how they roll so watch out for cheating and check your ballot several times before submitting it.

And be sure to report all suspected voter fraud.

I also recommend using a cell phone video to record the problem so you have proof (Check to make sure it is legal to record there).

UPDATE: No wonder Nevada is able to cheat. The voting machine technicians are SEIU. They are in the bag for Reid and the Democrats. If it is shown they cheated there will be hell to pay. We can either do it the right way or we can do it the hard way…

UPDATE 2: Dems try to deceive voters in PA

UPDATE 3: Democrat union official discusses being involved in voter fraud. What a surprise.

Cave Canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Big Dog

Gunline

If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.



Print This Post

If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.

28 Responses to “How Democrats Plan To Win – Cheat”

  1. Mr. Ogre says:

    Democrats honestly don’t believe they are cheating. After all, they’re doing it for your own good.

  2. Adam says:

    Voter fraud is still rare. Yet every election time the GOP rolls out the fear campaign about Democrats cheating or stealing votes. You’d think if so much cheating were taking place there would be some sort of criminal charges to point to or evidence or something. Where is it?

    Oh, machines failing. Again? Nevermind the fact that electronic voting machines fail and switch votes in such a way every election. This time around if switches to Democrats then clearly it’s a sign that Democrats are cheating. Democrats have been complaining about it for years and calling it GOP cheating but it’s just not true and I wish folks would stop doing it.

    Each of us reading this sit using devices made of hardware and software that does random and unexpected things all the time. Yet somehow when you enter a voting booth the technology is just supposed to magically work 100% of the time or else it’s fraud?

    • Big Dog says:

      Of course this comes from a guy who swears the 2000 election was stolen and that voting machines were rigged.

      I guess the audio of the Demo☭rat saying that he was involved in voter fraud was not enough.

      It is not rare, your guys stole the 1960 election from Nixon and that is well documented. It is not rare, look at how the recounts in Minnesota and Washington went in favor of Demo☭rats who were behind by hundreds of votes when just enough votes to make the difference were magically “found”

      Happens all the time and it will be happening this election.

      Few people prosecuted. We can’t get the justice dept to prosecute the black panther thugs racists who were intimidating people in Philly.

      • Adam says:

        “Of course this comes from a guy who swears the 2000 election was stolen and that voting machines were rigged.”

        In the past I may have said voting machines were rigged but I certainly do not believe that now. The problems in Florida had little to do with voting machines.

        “It is not rare, your guys stole the 1960 election from Nixon and that is well documented.”

        Well documented? I’d love to see that. Slate puts it this way:

        The GOP’s failure to prove fraud doesn’t mean, of course, that the election was clean. That question remains unsolved and unsolvable. But what’s typically left out of the legend is that multiple election boards saw no reason to overturn the results. Neither did state or federal judges. Neither did an Illinois special prosecutor in 1961. And neither have academic inquiries into the Illinois case (both a 1961 study by three University of Chicago professors and more recent research by political scientist Edmund Kallina concluded that whatever fraud existed wasn’t substantial enough to alter the election).

        But this is what happens when the election hinges on very close states just like in Florida in 2000. We know that in a state where Bush was declared the winner by a little over 500 votes that thousands of potential voters were incorrectly labeled felons and stripped of their right to vote.

        “It is not rare, look at how the recounts in Minnesota…”

        I’m unfamiliar with the case in Washington.
        There is still no significant evidence of fraud in Minnesota. Your side has simply made this up.

        “We can’t get the justice dept to prosecute the black panther thugs racists who were intimidating people in Philly.”

        I’m still grateful that our justice system works based on available evidence and not simply on the opinion of conservatives like yourself that are simply positive a crime happened and the men are guilty of it.

        • Big Dog says:

          Nixon decided not to ask for a recount because he did not think it would be good for the nation. However, the irregularities and voting problems were monumental. Just because someone says there is not enough to investigate does not mean it did not take place.

          I know, you are rule of law except when it comes to Scooter Libby who was known not to have done anything wrong. Yes, all for the rules except when it involves a woman who was not a covert agent crying about being outed.

          Oh yeah, you are all for the rule of law. Thugs with batons acting in the name of the NBPP, no problem. Intimidate voters, no problem unless it is a police car parked at a polling place, then you go bananas.

        • Big Dog says:

          Earl Mazo, a reporter for the pro-Nixon New York Herald Tribune, investigated the voting in Chicago and claimed to have discovered sufficient evidence of vote fraud to prove that the state was stolen for Kennedy.

          For example, Fannin County had only 4,895 registered voters, yet 6,138 votes were cast in that county, three-quarters for Kennedy. In an Angelina County precinct, Kennedy received a higher number of votes than the total number of registered voters in the precinct. When Republicans demanded a statewide recount, they learned that the state Board of Elections, whose members were all Democrats, had already certified Kennedy as the official winner in Texas
          Source: Wiki

          “On Election night 1960, nobody knew at midnight if Kennedy or Nixon won, and when Kennedy remarked that he had it made, his father, Joe Kennedy, told him he still had time to change his mind — not all the votes were counted yet in Cook County, Illinois. Gangster Sam Giancana was telling Judith Campbell, also referring to Cook County, that he had elected her boyfriend. Chicago’s Mayor Daley also claimed credit for electing Kennedy.

          “There is no certainty that Nixon won both Texas and Illinois [which he would have had to to do win the Electoral College vote]. What is certain, however, is that massive voter fraud on Kennedy’s behalf occurred in both states. In Texas, Kennedy’s margin of victory was 46,000 votes, but Lyndon Johnson’s Lone Star state political machine
          could easily have provided that number. In Illinois, Kennedy won by a bare 9,000 votes, and Mayor Daley, who held back Chicago’s vote until late in the evening, provided an extraordinary Cook County margin of victory of 450,000 votes. No thorough investigation of the massive irregularities was ever conducted, and partisans of Kennedy and Nixon still debate the bottom line.”
          Source

          Democrats know how to steal elections.

        • Adam says:

          “However, the irregularities and voting problems were monumental.”

          The same can be said of every election. The problem, and the part the right leaves off when telling this tall tale, is that from the election in 1960 there was no evidence that the problems that did occur added up to a stolen election.

          “Intimidate voters, no problem unless it is a police car parked at a polling place, then you go bananas.”

          Again with the police car? Did you ever find me saying anything about a police car? If I saw a case where the police car was parked again I’d say remove the car. But are we charging anyone with voter intimidation? I doubt it.

          “Thugs with batons acting in the name of the NBPP, no problem.”

          Don’t lie about my stance on this. I find plenty of problems with it. The men were stopped from doing what they were doing by being arrested. The man that held the weapon was charged and penalized for doing so. I’m fine with that. What you want is for them to be charged for crimes there’s no evidence they committed. If you have the names of anyone who will swear they were intimidated into not voting that day then list them and CC the Justice Department at the same time and maybe they’ll reopen the case. This is why voter intimation charges are rare. A video of men trying to do it is not enough.

  3. You can always count on Adam to defend the indefensible, if necessary by stating falsehoods as facts, hurling innuendoes, or in extremis, by changing the subject. Why bother with him? You’re not about to change his mind.

    • Big Dog says:

      He is a lot like Darrel that way.

    • Adam says:

      List the falsehoods I state as facts.

      List the innuendos.

      Tell me where I changed the subject.

      Can you do that or will you just ignore my request like every other time you’ve been challenged? The truth is the only people who shouldn’t bother arguing here are intellectual cowards like yourself.

  4. Big Dog says:

    I guess continuing to claim that “your side made this up” or it is such and such “and you know it” is stating the facts.

  5. Big Dog says:

    I understand that the left asserts as fact thjat the black panther pussy cats were not intimidating anyone by their mere presence at a polling place while holding a baton and taunting people.

    I wonder if it would be considered taunting to have ICE officers at all the polling places in nevada, Arizona and California.

    The mere presence should not be intimidation. I would think that anyway since they are officers of the law and have a right to be there but the left would scream voter intimidation.

    Adam did that with regard to police cars parked at polling places in Florida in 2000.

    • Adam says:

      “Adam did that with regard to police cars parked at polling places in Florida in 2000.”

      I’d still love to see where I said anything about it. If I said it I was wrong. I’ve said wrong things before and I don’t mind admitting so.

      I didn’t say that people were not intimidated, period. I just said that there was not any evidence that anyone was actually intimidated into not voting which makes or brakes the case. Your side can’t have an honest debate about this, can it?

  6. Big Dog says:

    I think it was at your old site. Yes Adam, you said that police cars were parked there to intimidate black voters. You iterated that here by saying if you saw a police car parked again you would say move the car.

    The question is, why? Is the mere presence of a police car intimidating? Have people complained? The car can be there or anywhere it wants.

    Perhaps we can say cops parked on the side of the road intimidate people who might speed so they have to move.

    Can the KKK stand outside black polling places as long as they do not say anything or intimidate?

    This guy said it felt intimidating.

    Listen to the report and count how many times the man says that person after person said they felt intimidated.

    Perhaps the Justice Dept did not investigate as well as you think.

    You do not have to be intimidated enough not to vote, you just have to feel that someone is trying to intimidate you.

  7. Adam says:

    “Democrat union official discusses being involved in voter fraud. What a surprise.”

    You can’t trust anything from the video’s maker or the host. They are known liars and the video is a laugher. Missing is the proof that any of it really happened. Of course a lack of verifiable information has never stopped Breitbart or Okeefe.

    • Big Dog says:

      No, they have been discredited in your mind. No proof exists fo rthe claims that any of the prostitute videos were edited and the things really took place. Just because NY refused to prosecute does not mean that a crime did not occur.

      We have the man’s own words. What more do you need? If it is a Republican you would call that convicting proof.

      • Adam says:

        “No proof exists for the claims that any of the prostitute videos were edited and the things really took place.”

        Except for the fact that many of the details of the story were untrue such as the fact that the video was edited to appear as if he showed up in a “pimp” costume inside the ACORN offices. The man is a liar, a criminal and a pervert. Keep citing his work at the expense of your own credibility.

        “If it is a Republican you would call that convicting proof.”

        And that makes it more right for you to say it? None of the statements from anyone else about the election back up what the man says. The man had no evidence that the machines were ever there, let alone loaded with any votes or that they were counted as votes. There is no documents or information to support it whatsoever. So remind me again how you think this is worthy of citing as evidence Democrats steal elections?

        • Big Dog says:

          Right, typical. Ignore the crimes and blame the people who exposed them.

          And tell me, why would the guy just say that. He did not know he was being recorded so why would he say it?

        • Adam says:

          “Ignore the crimes and blame the people who exposed them.”

          Your problem is you accepted the truth of the crime without any evidence that a crime even took place. If we’re accusing people of crimes then we need evidence, not speculation and bias which is all you have.

          • Big Dog says:

            No, a crime was committed. You admitted to that the only thing we differ on is what they were charged with, what they should have been charged with and why the Justice Dept decided not to pursue the issue. It won by default and dismissed the case.

            We know why that is.

            The police can be wherever they want. No one needs to worry about an arrest unless they break the law. Should the police not be allowed to patrol the city because people might worry about being arrested?

  8. Big Dog says:

    You are entitled to believe that intimidation at a polling place is not the same as voter intimidation.

    So then you would agree that it is OK for the police to be there? And of course it is OK for ICE to walk through polling places. If they are intimidating in their appearance that would not be the same as voter intimidation.

    The only people who would be intimidated are not allowed to vote and that would mean they are not voters so no voter intimidation could take place.

    Thanks for clearing that up. Make sure not to call for the police car to be removed.

    • Adam says:

      You fail to admit that every situation is different. We can look at each one both real and hypothetical but I can’t make any blanket statement about the whole of voter intimidation as you seem to want me to do.

      NBPP thugs: They were arrested for their actions and one was charged for wielding a weapon. I agree with what happened to them.

      Police Car: Remove it just in case unless it has a real purpose for being there. We have seen the threat of arrest being used to keep voters from a polling place many times before and there’s no need to play into that.

      KKK: If they are dressed in their Halloween costumes and yelling at voters with a weapon as the NBPP members were doing then arrest them too. What they’d be charged with depends on what they did and who testifies against them.

      ICE: I don’t know why they’d be there. Why would they?

  9. Blake says:

    Democrats KNOW how to steal elections- one has only to research Duval County in Texas, and George Parr, along with LBJ, and you will see how LBJ became Senator.