Here’s Hussein!

Yes folks, he is beginning to shed his skin as he slithers over to the muslim world to prostrate himself before the Middle East and demonstrate that he will be a muslim puppy for anyone with islamic roots. First stop- Saudi Arabia, where Hussein could begin to emphasize his middle name, and of course, his religious affiliation. One has to believe that he was shaking like a chihuahua with a brain seizure just to be near the Saudi King, the “Protector of Mecca and Medina”, or some such title.

But the real focus on his America is Wrong tour was the speech in Cairo, where he went out of his way to say that things must change (at least on our side), and we are sorry.

Some of Mr. Obama’s language drew appreciative applause from his audience at Cairo University as he delivered a sweeping message that was forceful — and at times scolding — promoting democracy in Egypt, warning Israelis against building new settlements, and acknowledging that the United States had fallen short of its ideals, particularly in the Iraq war.

nytimes.com

Of course he was scolding Israel- he is a muslim- he has admitted it now, and this is probably why he won’t go to Israel on this tour- he’s too busy sucking teat at the breast of the muslim world to look up and see reality. Between that, and his incredible conceit, he had them at Allah.

Mr. Obama offered few details for how to solve myriad problems and conflicts around the globe, but he offered up his own biography as a credible connection to his audience. While the message touched upon a litany of challenges, it boiled down to simply this: Barack Hussein Obama was standing at the podium as the American president.

“I am also proud to carry with me the goodwill of the American people, and a greeting of peace from Muslim communities in my country: assalaamu alaykum,” Mr. Obama said, delivering a common greeting signifying peaceful intent.

nytimes.com

This guy really doesn’t get it, but then why should he- he has ignored the real world his entire life, why should he start now? But between bin Laden’s taped message, and that of al Zarkawi previously, and then the video of an Al Qaida recruiter speaking of bringing anthrax over the Mexican border, I think that the muslim world isn’t listening to the Closet Muslim, but is still trying to kill us wherever they can.

The video is compelling- it first surfaced in February, but was vetted only recently as being legitimate- if you go to you tube, and type in Abdallah Nafisi/ anthrax, you will have the video you can watch. It is fairly disturbing, and points out one of the reasons that we need to close the border. But Hussein won’t do it, because it might offend someone who might vote for him- he is that crass and calculating.

So when anthrax comes to your town, which seems a certainty, given his loyalty to his muslim roots, you can be sure and thank Hussein Obama, that is if you and your family are still alive.
Blake

If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.



Print This Post

If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.

35 Responses to “Here’s Hussein!”

  1. Darrel says:

    It’s so nice to have a president that is not hated by the whole world. What a pleasure. I actually look forward to traveling and some of our friends may be able to retire those little Canadian covers they put over their US passports.

    No, maybe it’ll take a few more years of Obama before America gets that radically popular!

    The headline at Huff Po this morning:

    “I HAVE COME HERE TO SEEK A NEW BEGINNING”
    Standing Ovation At Cairo University… “I Love You” Shouted Three Times…

    Jeepers, why is he being nice to these human beings, can’t we just go to war with them and drop some bombs on them already?

    BLK: “he is a muslim- he has admitted it now…”

    DAR
    See, now if you were wanting an example of a lie this is a good example of one. It’s false, and you know it’s false. So you’re lying. You do it a lot actually and I can only assume it’s because you aren’t the slightest bit interested in being known as a person who says truthful things.

    D.

    • Blake says:

      I see the pot calling the kettle black here. All you do is twist statements, and cite YOUR OWN web site- I guess that is as valid as me having an opinion, right? Go on- cite your made up site some more. Its truly a dumbing- down of facts there.

      • Darrel says:

        BLK: I see the pot calling the kettle black here.>>

        DAR
        Explain your use of this cliche. It’s not clear you understand it.

        BLK: All you do is twist statements,>>

        DAR
        Show this.

        BLK: and cite YOUR OWN web site->>

        DAR
        I did not cite my own web site above. You are confused. Anything I cite from my website, or this web site (which I have quoted), or any website, is either backed up by references directly or can be upon request. I don’t make claims that cannot be supported. You should try this method.

        BLK: I guess that is as valid as me having an opinion, right?>>

        DAR
        No, your opinions are usually a product of your bottom and based upon misinformation that easily shown to be false. There is a difference.

        D.

  2. Blake says:

    No, D he said this, so either he was lying then, or he is lying now- which is it?

    • Darrel says:

      Quote, cite, him, saying, this.

      When are you going to learn how to make a case for your assertions/beliefs? Or is this something beyond your capability?

      D.

      • Blake says:

        I have before, but you refuse to listen or apparently, read, so why should I keep saying the obvious truths.
        Hussein is a shill who will say anything he thinks his audience wants to hear.

  3. victoria says:

    Hey D when are you going to learn how to make a case for your assertions/beliefs? or is this something beyond your capabilities? All I see is someone who comes here and spouts off in a snide, sarcastic, arrogant tone just like all the far left goons and then you think that that makes you right. “I don’t make claims that cannot be supported. You should try this method.” It is pretty hard to support lies from the left and the only way you can do it is to use leftwing moonbat sites like the Huffington Puffington.

    • Darrel says:

      Hey Victoria. I don’t make claims that can’t be supported. Try challenging one and see.

      And I note above you make claims, but you don’t support them. You don’t even try.

      You should try my method. It’s much more persuasive in the long run.

      D.

  4. Macker says:

    Yep. الرئيس أوباما: our first Muslim President, and a Master of Taqiyya.

  5. Adam says:

    Another wonderful fact free anti-Muslim rant by Blake. Right, Obama again admits the US has made mistakes and a conservative thinks this makes us look weak? Get real. Next thing you know Obama will be holding hands and kissing the Saudi King and that is just unforgivable. Wing-nut fact fail.

    What I want to know is what would be so wrong if Obama actually was a Muslim? He’s not of course and only idiots suggest otherwise, but it’s worth a question.

    • Big Dog says:

      Nothing would be wrong if he had been honest about it up front and if he did not allow it to dictate what we do as Americans or the way he leads.

      No, he won’t hold hands, he will just bow down. I notice the King grew a bit. The Obama spin masters told us he bowed because he was taller than the King. Looks like they are about the same height now.

    • Blake says:

      The thing is not that he is muslim- if indeed that is his true religion ( and not trying to ingratiate himself to Arabs)- but that he lied- I am sorry for you Adam, Darrel, if this does not bother you but it does bother me, especially after the lies about “transparency”,no lobbyists, $3,000 refundable tax credit for each NEW employee hired,” I do not want to own a car company”- now he owns TWO- I am just tired of the lies. They may turn you on, but they do nothing for me.

    • Macker says:

      Islam is a Cult of DEATH. It hates everyone who is not a Muslim: especially Jews, Christians, the West, and all Infidels.
      Islam means “Submission.” Well, lan astaslem. I will NOT Submit to that bunch.

  6. Adam says:

    Obama didn’t lie about Islam because he’s a Christian still despite what you say. Obama didn’t lie about transparency just because he can’t live up to the bogus standard for transparency your side has made up to crucify him over.

    Obama made 100’s, maybe 1000’s of campaign promises. Sure he has fallen back on some of but if you called a broken campaign promise a lie then there wouldn’t be a single US President that wasn’t a big fat liar. It’s funny to watch you squirm over the things Obama has gone back on while ignoring all the promises he has kept0 so far and worked hard over.

    No it doesn’t turn me on since Obama’s not lying as you propose. Does it turn you on to make up lies about Obama?

    • Blake says:

      Don’t need to make up lies about Hussein, he does very well himself.

    • Blake says:

      I agree that politicians break promises, but not many place such importance on “transparency”- the very word was seldom used until Hussein began using it, so this he brings on himself.
      The AMOUNT of promises he has broken, blatantly, is truly staggering, and I find it unbelievable that you cold actually defend him. And you call me a “wingnut”. Look in the mirror.

  7. Darrel says:

    So I challenged Blake to back up his claim that Obama has lied about being a muslim, or not being one, or whatever he is claiming is supposedly a lie, and he does not even try to defend it. He won’t even state specifically and clearly his claim. He runs.

    What pathetic cowardice.

    Maybe I’ll get around to building the case for his claim, and then carefully list the many and obvious reasons why it fails. But really, this is childish silly stuff, unworthy of discussion by adults. And if Blake doesn’t even have the testicular fortitude to state what he is claiming, then I am hesitant to do the work for him.

    As one fellow said:

    “I don’t throw stones at every dog that barks.” –Winston Churchill

    D.

    • Blake says:

      I don’t cut and run- I do have a life other than this post- Hussein first admitted he was a muslim on George Stefanapoulos program, but what bothers me is the general pattern of dissimulation of morally ambiguous statements, as if, like Clinton, he will tell you what you want to hear, even if it clearly contradicts what he has said before.
      Morally, the man is an invertebrate.

      • Darrel says:

        BLK: “I don’t cut and run”

        DAR
        Well, usually you don’t. And I like that. Stand up for what you believe. But you keep making these bogus charges and it’s not too much to ask you to back them up. Let’s see how this one holds up.

        I was actually watching that show with George Snuffalufagus (that’s what I call him) when this happened, and I said to my self, uh oh, the wingnuts are going to go bonkers over this.

        The debunk:

        ***
        ST. LOUIS, Mo. – Sen. Barack Obama’s foes seized Sunday upon a brief slip of the tongue, when the Democratic presidential nominee was outlining his Christianity but accidentally said, “my Muslim faith.”

        The three words — immediately corrected — were during an exchange with ABC’s George Stephanopoulos on “This Week,” when he was trying to criticize the quiet smear campaign suggesting he is a Muslim.

        But illustrating the difficulty of preventing false rumors about his faith from spreading, anti-Obama groups within one hour of the interview had sliced it out of context and were sending it around via email. They also were blogging about it.

        Mr. Obama, who is a Christian and often proudly speaks about how his faith has influenced his public service, said he finds it “deeply offensive” that there are efforts “coming out of the Republican camp to suggest that perhaps I’m not who I say I am when it comes to my faith.”

        http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/sep/07/obama-verbal-slip-fuels-his-critics/

        DAR
        So again, we find your charge inaccurate, ridiculous and unsupportable.

        Try again.

        D.

        • Blake says:

          I find it telling that he was corrected by George S.- evidently that truth slipped right on by Hussein’s internal censors.
          The truth is that he says whatever he thinks his audience wants to hear, and that is dishonest, D. It’s not just politics, it’s just nasty- the man should have some ethics, but does not.
          I agree that his true religion, whatever it is, is a side issue. I just wish he’d grow a pair and quit apologizing for our success in this world. The muslims have problems that we are not going to solve, because they are ignorant- once their civilization was preeminent , but now they throw rocks at tanks.

        • Darrel says:

          To the extent he is apologizing, he is doing so for the profound mistakes of Bush and his disastrous and bloody war against a middle east nation based upon bogus information. And quite rightfully.

          D.
          ——————
          “I wasn’t happy when we found out there wasn’t weapons, and we’ve got an intelligence group together to figure out why.”
          –Bush, Second Presidential Debate, St. Louis, Missouri, Oct. 8, 2004

        • Blake says:

          Bush made some missteps, but the faulty intel was not his fault, unless you believe that he alone should have gone undercover in Iraq
          When several (at least five) intel agencies, AND Saddam himself all said that he had WMDs, I find it absurd for this argument to even be made by you.
          Further, the only thing we can say that is true beyond dispute is not that there were no WMDs, but we haven’t yet found them. Do you believe that it would be easy to find an arsenal of weaponized bio, or chem weapons, when they might be as small as two or three paint cans? In an area about the size of California?
          Don’t be a fool, D. It’s always more complicated than a movie.

        • Darrel says:

          BLK: “Bush made some missteps, but the faulty intel was not his fault,”>>

          DAR
          If you call invading and smashing a country at the cost of 4 to 5 trillion dollars a “misstep.”

          There is a small mountain of evidence showing he and Cheney were pressing the CIA and withholding and cherry-picking the data. I’ll limit myself to three examples (of dozens).

          1) Italian Secret Service knew key Iraq intelligence was falsified, and told U.S. officials before the war
          “Italian lawmaker: U.S. told of WMD forgeries” Associated Press

          2) Five senior officials from Germany’s Federal Intelligence Service, or BND, said in interviews with The Times that they warned U.S. intelligence authorities that the source, an Iraqi defector code-named Curveball, never claimed to produce germ weapons and never saw anyone else do so.

          According to the Germans, President Bush mischaracterized Curveball’s information when he warned before the war that Iraq had at least seven mobile factories brewing biological poisons. Then-Secretary of State Colin L. Powell also misstated Curveball’s accounts in his prewar presentation to the United Nations on Feb. 5, 2003, the Germans said.

          Curveball’s German handlers for the last six years said his information was often vague, mostly secondhand and impossible to confirm.

          3) White House withheld intelligence data. Specifically, the Administration withheld or repressed portions of intelligence documents which questioned and contradicted the excerpts being used to promote the war.
          “Asterisks Dot White House’s Iraq Argument” — Washington Post Page A01, November 12, 2005 and here: “Inaccuracies in Bush’s Defense of Lead-Up to War”

          I have the links for all of the above if you want them.

          BLK: “not that there were no WMDs, but we haven’t yet found them.>>

          DAR
          Good grief. Let it go. That horse left the barn a long time ago.

          BLK: …they might be as small as two or three paint cans?>>

          DAR
          We went to war over three paint cans of poison that no one can find? I rest my case.

          D.
          —————
          “Now look, part of the reason we went into Iraq was — the main reason we went into Iraq, at the time, was we thought he had weapons of mass destruction. It turns out he didn’t, but he had the capacity to make weapons of mass destruction.”
          –GW Bush, press conference, Monday, August 21, 2006

          Anyone who can buy several bags of fertilizer has such “capacity.” See: Timothy McVeigh.

          • Big Dog says:

            We know Hussein had WMD because he used them. We also know that reports show they were taken to Syria. I can tell you that Hussein did not get rid of them by destruction and Darrel, if you claim to be an expert in this (chemical warfare agents, destruction, and medical treatment) you have no chance of keeping up.

            Hussein could not have destroyed them without leaving evidence. No evidence exists. One of his generals stated that they were taken to Syria. I believe this is the most likely scenario.

            But we know he had nerve agent and mustard agent because he used them both. He did not destroy them because there are no signs that he did and there would be.

  8. Darrel says:

    BLK: “Of course he was scolding Israel- he is a muslim- he has admitted it now…”>>

    DAR
    When did Obama “admit” “he is a muslim.”

    Let’s see the quote.

    You can’t produce it which shows it’s not Obama that is the liar.

    It’s you.

    It’s rather ironic and hypocritical how this charge of liar blows up in your face and makes you into what you falsely condemn in someone else. Karmic justice indeed.

    D.

    • Blake says:

      oh, and D- you just keep obfuscating the situation- your guy is dishonest, and no amount of your moronic left wing site links that you put up to obscure the situation will change my mind, or anyine who is a thinking person- you and Adam can be an Obamazombie if you wish- its a free country- so far- but your Hussein is gonna run out of time soon- no credibility, and soon, no Congress. We’re going to get Congress back, and then we will be able to steer this country back to where it should be, and all of kyou can move to France as Alec Baldwin said he would if Bush kwon.
      Guess what? He lied too.

  9. Katy the mean old lady says:

    Just listened to a re-play of Reagan’s 40th anniversary D-Day speech. It made me cry. I hope our Apoligist in Chief keeps his mouth ultra-shut, but I get the feeling that he will say he is sorry for ecological damage to the clifs plus polluting the sea with all those bodies.

  10. Katy the mean old lady says:

    Darrel,
    Are you a total jack-ass or is there some redeeming quality? You put a Canadian cover on your passport? Yup, that fools lots of
    official people. Lots of luck in Singapore!
    I’m so glad that you are on target with being ashamed of your country.

    • Darrel says:

      KATY: “Are you a total jack-ass or is there some redeeming quality?”>>

      DAR
      I would love to tell you about my redeeming qualities but Blake would claim that I am bragging. And he would probably be right.

      I didn’t say *I* put a Canadian cover over my passport, I said I have friends that do.

      Up until a year ago, I was Canadian (LPR status) and would have traveled under a Canadian passport. Now I am US and will use my US passport when I travel to Europe (my wife will use her Canadian one). Since Obama is being so nice to everyone, I probably won’t need to cover mine up.

      If we are attacked and they want to shoot the Americans, maybe I can hide mine and share hers.

      Americans disguising themselves as Canadians is a tradition that goes way back and probably got going during the controversial Vietnam years. My social studies teacher in 1983, an American (former military, served on Israel border), told us about this.

      As for fooling officials? No, obviously, you take the cover off.

      D.

      • Blake says:

        Yep, there are lots of Americans who like dressing down.
        Canada is kind of like Oklahoma is to Texans- extraneous territory- and I say that with relatives in Montreal.
        Canada is one direction the Monroe Doctrine has not gone.
        Hmmmmm- we could solve a few problems if…..naw- never bedevil the helpless.

        • Darrel says:

          Careful, last time you tried that, the Canadians came down and burnt your White House.

          I wasn’t trained to be patriotic, so it’s hard for me to see it as much more than tribalism. Sometimes it’s useful, mostly it’s not. Hopefully someday we’ll out grow it.

        • Blake says:

          It wasn’t the Canadians it was the Brits- with the meek Canucks under their thumb, as usual. I can understand that you do not understand Patriotism- you stand for nothing, so you will run away from anything- must be the french in you- you must have absorbed it in Canada.

      • Blake says:

        D- maybe some day you cangrow up and have friends with a spine- ones who are proud of their country. And don’t worry- if we are attacked, I am sure that your wife will protect you- or maybe not- better be nice to her.

  11. Darrel says:

    We know he “had” them at one time because we still have the receipts. But that’s old junk that was rotting and useless when we kicked him out of Kuwait.

    The “taken to Syria” theory doesn’t hold up to scrutiny and isn’t taken seriously outside of crackpot circles.

    The fact that there is no evidence he destroyed them comports nicely with the data showing he didn’t have them and our basis for thinking he did, was cherry-picked, junk.

    D.
    ——————-
    Saddam had no WMD for a decade, report says
    Thursday, October 07, 2004

    By Bob Drogin and Greg Miller

    WASHINGTON — Saddam Hussein did not produce or possess any weapons of mass destruction for more than a decade before the U.S.-led invasion last year, according to a comprehensive CIA report released yesterday.
    Saddam intended to someday reconstitute his illicit programs and rebuild at least some of his weapons if United Nations sanctions were eased and he had the opportunity, the report concluded. But the Iraqi regime had no formal, written strategy to revive the banned programs after sanctions, and no staff or infrastructure in place to do so, the investigators found.

    The 1,000-page report by Charles Duelfer, head of the CIA’s Iraq Survey Group weapons-hunting teams, is the most definitive account of Iraq’s long-defunct weapons programs…”

    http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2002056408_weapons07.html