Comments on: Global Warming Science That Hides The Truth http://www.onebigdog.net/global-warming-science-that-hides-the-truth/ "Let that be a lesson to you, boys and girls. Don't ever argue with the Big Dog because the Big Dog is always right" Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:27:03 -0500 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Darrel http://www.onebigdog.net/global-warming-science-that-hides-the-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-144171 Darrel Wed, 02 Dec 2009 17:49:56 +0000 http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=8409#comment-144171 Bigd: "how do I know this is not data that had the trick applied to hide the real trend.">> DAR As explained above, in context, the "trick" didn't "hide" anything. All the data was right there, in plain sight. Bigd: “how do I know this is not data that had the trick applied to hide the real trend.”>>

DAR
As explained above, in context, the “trick” didn’t “hide” anything. All the data was right there, in plain sight.

]]> By: Darrel http://www.onebigdog.net/global-warming-science-that-hides-the-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-144170 Darrel Wed, 02 Dec 2009 17:47:19 +0000 http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=8409#comment-144170 BLK: "the truth hurts, doesn’t it Dar?">> DAR Nope, the truth feels great. But I am sure it has been your experience that the truth hurts. After all you find it smacking you over the head all the time. The reality, is that if a scientist really wanted to make money they would approach the big funding like big energy and say: "hey, I can put together a big robust study showing this warming science is a bunch of hooey. Will you fund me?" And of course they would. And he would be come famous and win the Nobel Prize. And of course Bush's government would have LOVED to have supported/funded that sort of thing during his eight years in rule. But the trouble is, no scientist can do such a thing because the data simply doesn't support such a claim (or your position). At all. That's why all of the scientific organizations in the world say you are wrong, and agree with me. In fact, it's so obvious now that even the energy industry (Exon etc.), say you are wrong. Sorry 'bout that, but that's the truth. The truth that hurts you, not me. D. BLK: “the truth hurts, doesn’t it Dar?”>>

DAR
Nope, the truth feels great. But I am sure it has been your experience that the truth hurts. After all you find it smacking you over the head all the time.

The reality, is that if a scientist really wanted to make money they would approach the big funding like big energy and say: “hey, I can put together a big robust study showing this warming science is a bunch of hooey. Will you fund me?”

And of course they would. And he would be come famous and win the Nobel Prize.

And of course Bush’s government would have LOVED to have supported/funded that sort of thing during his eight years in rule.

But the trouble is, no scientist can do such a thing because the data simply doesn’t support such a claim (or your position).

At all.

That’s why all of the scientific organizations in the world say you are wrong, and agree with me. In fact, it’s so obvious now that even the energy industry (Exon etc.), say you are wrong.

Sorry ’bout that, but that’s the truth. The truth that hurts you, not me.

D.

]]> By: Blake http://www.onebigdog.net/global-warming-science-that-hides-the-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-144159 Blake Wed, 02 Dec 2009 16:43:49 +0000 http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=8409#comment-144159 I know- the truth hurts, doesn't it Dar? Most of the scientists' money rely on their tacit agreement that the earth is warming- so they go along to keep their funding, so that Al Gore and others can make more money, so they can give the scientists more money so that these "scientists" can make more fallicious statements. An endless loop, with no true science anywhere, just a "green" circle jerk. I know- the truth hurts, doesn’t it Dar? Most of the scientists’ money rely on their tacit agreement that the earth is warming- so they go along to keep their funding, so that Al Gore and others can make more money, so they can give the scientists more money so that these “scientists” can make more fallicious statements. An endless loop, with no true science anywhere, just a “green” circle jerk.

]]> By: Big Dog http://www.onebigdog.net/global-warming-science-that-hides-the-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-144149 Big Dog Wed, 02 Dec 2009 12:38:08 +0000 http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=8409#comment-144149 Maybe we should go farther back and go from when it was hotter than it is now. Besides, how do I know this is not data that had the trick applied to hide the real trend. The emails are damning and show that the science is NOT settled. Settled science does not need data manipulated to make a point. Maybe we should go farther back and go from when it was hotter than it is now.

Besides, how do I know this is not data that had the trick applied to hide the real trend.

The emails are damning and show that the science is NOT settled. Settled science does not need data manipulated to make a point.

]]> By: Darrel http://www.onebigdog.net/global-warming-science-that-hides-the-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-144142 Darrel Wed, 02 Dec 2009 07:14:33 +0000 http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=8409#comment-144142 MR PINK: The global warming alarmists have manipulated the data they used and excluded the data that did not support their theory.>> DAR Sorry, that doesn't pass the laugh test. The idea that the thousands of scientists involved in this are all part of a conspiracy is too stupid for words. Mrpink: whisleblowing is good.>> DAR Yes it is. So you've blown your whistle, now lets see what you've got. What have you got? Make your case for you claims. You do know there is a difference between making claims, and actually backing them up? Right? Mrpink: politicians are moving forward as if nothing has happened>> DAR That's because... nothing has happened. Feel free to show otherwise. D. ----------------- <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/22/global-warmings-impacts-h_n_366994.html" rel="nofollow">Global Warming's Impacts Have Sped Up, Worsened Since Kyoto</a>. MR PINK: The global warming alarmists have manipulated the data they used and excluded the data that did not support their theory.>>

DAR
Sorry, that doesn’t pass the laugh test. The idea that the thousands of scientists involved in this are all part of a conspiracy is too stupid for words.

Mrpink: whisleblowing is good.>>

DAR
Yes it is. So you’ve blown your whistle, now lets see what you’ve got. What have you got? Make your case for you claims. You do know there is a difference between making claims, and actually backing them up? Right?

Mrpink: politicians are moving forward as if nothing has happened>>

DAR
That’s because… nothing has happened.

Feel free to show otherwise.

D.
—————–
Global Warming’s Impacts Have Sped Up, Worsened Since Kyoto.

]]> By: Darrel http://www.onebigdog.net/global-warming-science-that-hides-the-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-144141 Darrel Wed, 02 Dec 2009 07:06:52 +0000 http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=8409#comment-144141 Bigd: "It is not warmer">> DAR Maybe you should <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Instrumental_Temperature_Record.png" rel="nofollow">try holding the graph right side up</a>? Bigd: "temperature increases and decreases are natural. CO2 is not a culprit.">> DAR Actually, <a href="http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/" rel="nofollow">it is</a>. That spike? Man made. Not natural. D. Bigd: “It is not warmer”>>

DAR
Maybe you should
try holding the graph right side up?

Bigd: “temperature increases and decreases are natural. CO2 is not a culprit.”>>

DAR
Actually, it is. That spike? Man made. Not natural.

D.

]]> By: Darrel http://www.onebigdog.net/global-warming-science-that-hides-the-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-144140 Darrel Wed, 02 Dec 2009 06:51:24 +0000 http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=8409#comment-144140 BLK: "none of the “scientists”... are truly doing impartial SCIENTIFIC tests on the climate... a false consensus, driven by money, and nothing else>> DAR Now that is truly an amazing conspiracy! No scientists actually doing impartial scientific tests on climate. I can't even make fun of a comment like that. D. BLK: “none of the “scientists”… are truly doing impartial SCIENTIFIC tests on the climate… a false consensus, driven by money, and nothing else>>

DAR
Now that is truly an amazing conspiracy! No scientists actually doing impartial scientific tests on climate. I can’t even make fun of a comment like that.

D.

]]> By: Darrel http://www.onebigdog.net/global-warming-science-that-hides-the-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-144139 Darrel Wed, 02 Dec 2009 06:36:21 +0000 http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=8409#comment-144139 INON: Global warming has increased since Kyoto. Why is that? Probably because it isn’t man made.>> DAR That's called a non sequiter. INON: I have a simple question that you Global Warmers never answer;>> DAR Oh really. Did you look? INON: How did the polar bears and all the endangered animals survive the last global warming,>> DAR 99.9% of all species that have ever lived are extinct, so lots of animals *didn't* survive the last great warming. INON: 30,000 years ago when Alaska was a semi-tropical paradise?>> DAR Show Alaska was a semi-tropical paradise 30k years ago. INON: Or did the bear evolve since then?>> DAR A lot of adaptation can occur in 30k years. INON: sometimes, they refer to acually lying.>> DAR Your task is to show it refers to "actually lying." Oops, I already showed that it didn't refer to lying. INON: Dar, this is your religion>> DAR My religion (more of a hobby really) is finding out what is true. D. INON: Global warming has increased since Kyoto. Why is that? Probably because it isn’t man made.>>

DAR
That’s called a non sequiter.

INON: I have a simple question that you Global Warmers never answer;>>

DAR
Oh really. Did you look?

INON: How did the polar bears and all the endangered animals survive the last global warming,>>

DAR
99.9% of all species that have ever lived are extinct, so lots of animals *didn’t* survive the last great warming.

INON: 30,000 years ago when Alaska was a semi-tropical paradise?>>

DAR
Show Alaska was a semi-tropical paradise 30k years ago.

INON: Or did the bear evolve since then?>>

DAR
A lot of adaptation can occur in 30k years.

INON: sometimes, they refer to acually lying.>>

DAR
Your task is to show it refers to “actually lying.” Oops, I already showed that it didn’t refer to lying.

INON: Dar, this is your religion>>

DAR
My religion (more of a hobby really) is finding out what is true.

D.

]]> By: Blake http://www.onebigdog.net/global-warming-science-that-hides-the-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-144083 Blake Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:35:55 +0000 http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=8409#comment-144083 D, you ARE a hockey stick- this "science" is every bit as valid as the old alchemical, "lead-to- gold" theories of the middle ages- none of the "scientists" or, if you prefer the term "funding whores", (as I do) are truly doing impartial SCIENTIFIC tests on the climate, because their funding is derived from AGREEING with the "climate- warming" data- it might be a "consensus", but it is a false consensus, driven by money, and nothing else- a child with a rudimentary education can see through these lies, and to have you attempt to defend this is laughable at best, and a sorry attempt to suck up to other liberals. D, you ARE a hockey stick- this “science” is every bit as valid as the old alchemical, “lead-to- gold” theories of the middle ages- none of the “scientists” or, if you prefer the term “funding whores”, (as I do) are truly doing impartial SCIENTIFIC tests on the climate, because their funding is derived from AGREEING with the “climate- warming” data- it might be a “consensus”, but it is a false consensus, driven by money, and nothing else- a child with a rudimentary education can see through these lies, and to have you attempt to defend this is laughable at best, and a sorry attempt to suck up to other liberals.

]]> By: Big Dog http://www.onebigdog.net/global-warming-science-that-hides-the-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-144031 Big Dog Sat, 28 Nov 2009 13:58:31 +0000 http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=8409#comment-144031 Or the ones showing that Bush tricked Congress into the war (pretty good for the dumbest man in the room). Or the ones showing that Bush tricked Congress into the war (pretty good for the dumbest man in the room).

]]>