Feinstein And The Other Oath Breakers

Senator Dianne Feinstein of Commiefornia has introduced her anti Second Amendment bill and in that bill she and several other oath breakers list 150 different firearms that they want banned. Her anti American bill also calls for a national registry ala Adolph Hitler and most other dictators.

Feinstein introduced this bill and the national registry provision would violate Public Law 99-308, the Firearms Owner’s Protection Act, which prohibits a national database. This law was the result of documented abused by the ATF in enforcing the Gun Control Act of 1968.

That should come as no surprise since the attempt to ban firearms is in and of itself, unconstitutional as it violates the Second Amendment.

Keep in mind, Feinstein had her own carry permit because she was threatened with harm. She had one while claiming other women do not need to have firearms because women are not strong enough to use these machines of destruction.

She was joined by Chuck Schumer of New York, another gun grabber who has a New York carry permit AND has armed officers surrounding him when he is in New York.

Banning firearms will not stop the next lunatic from shooting people because criminals and those who have mental health problems will not follow the law. They will still be able to get firearms, banned or not, and they will still be able to get magazines that hold more than 10 rounds. These are facts and have been demonstrated time and again. The Columbine shootings happened in the middle of the last “assault weapons” ban so it would appear as if the ban did not work.

It is important to emphasize the point that laws do not keep criminals from doing bad things. The overarching thing to remember when it is reported that someone murdered people with a gun is that MURDER IS ILLEGAL. If laws against murder are not obeyed what makes anyone think laws banning the instruments used by criminals will be obeyed?

The very people who want to ban firearms are against the death penalty. They claim that the death penalty does not deter crime. That is an issue for another time but someone please tell me, if the death penalty is not a deterrent how will a gun ban deter criminals from using guns to do bad things?

This whole anti American bill from Feinstein and her cohorts is nothing but a move to further control people’s lives. Millions of gun owners do not commit crimes each day but they suffer for the criminals who do.

We have not banned banks to prevent bank robberies. We have not banned cars or alcohol to prevent drunk driving. We have not banned forks to prevent obesity but somehow banning guns will prevent gun crime.

Gun control is not about guns, it is about control.

MOLON LABE

Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.
Big Dog

Gunline

[jpsub]



Print This Post

If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.

3 Responses to “Feinstein And The Other Oath Breakers”

  1. LD Jackson says:

    I haven’t had time to read a lot on the legislation Senator Feinstein is proposing, but what I have read tells me all I need to know. She evidently has a problem with the definition of “infringe”.

  2. Vxnschatzee says:

    These people who feel that they are entitled to armed security and gun premits make it very obvious that they feel their lives are more valuable and important than the rest of society – us, our children, anyone not in their royal court. This disgusts me and I hope they call that bill up and it falls flat on its face. They are going to spark a true revolution if they keep pushing people into a corner where it’s either give up your rights and freedoms or come out fighting. I hate these idiots.

  3. Blake says:

    First, the Second Amendment prohibits ANY gun control, as the last part of the
    amendment reads, …” theright of the people to keep and bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.” There’s a period after that sentence, not a comma, semi- colon, colon, or any other sentence extender that might imply that there are circumstances that might disqualify any person from carrying a firearm undere any circumstances. there should be NO circumstances under which a firearm is prohibited.