Comments on: Don’t Let Obama Fool You About Donors

By: Bunny Colvin

Bunny Colvin — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 21:13:10 +0000

We’d all be dead. For sure. Only those big bad (r)epukes can protect us.

PEACE

By: Reason

Reason — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 20:28:30 +0000

Where would we be now had we followed the “cut & run” strategies of Obama & friends? How about Carter? Clinton certainly didn’t do us any favors on combating terrorism either…

Again you are like a monkey flinging poo yet offer nothing of value, no real position to debate, and not support for anything you spout.

By: Bunny Colvin

Bunny Colvin — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 17:38:41 +0000

Yep- I knew it! It will be the Dems fault…again. It always is. Thank God we have tough guy repubbers like Larry Craig, Mark Foley, and REASONless to protect us. Otherwise, we’d be toast.

PEACE

By: Reason

Reason — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 14:25:27 +0000

No they’ll wait until Obama pulls the troops out of Iraq and pursues the war in Afghanistan that cannot be won without basically invading Pakistan at this point. The Pakistani Government will have to start actually controlling their border region with Afghanistan for us to win without invading.

Also several of the organizations and people you mention favor lax immigration and border policing, sanctuary cities, and illegal immigration. So yes they could in a way be considered responsible if terrorists and say a nuke, chemical weapon, or dirty bomb were smuggled across our southern border and used on American soil. Why? Because their time, money, and effort goes into thwarting proper border security, sheltering criminals, and denigrating every legal US immigrant. Should they be held criminally responsible should anything like the scenario I mention happen? Perhaps, it depends on the level of their efforts, but public humiliation is definitely in order. The San Fransisco City council should be incarcerated even now, and likely facing the death penalty.

By: Bunny Colvin

Bunny Colvin — Thu, 07 Aug 2008 22:35:34 +0000

So then, this sure-thing attack will be Bush's fault? Or will it somehow be Bill Clinton's fault again? Or Hillary- right? No, no. Jesse Jackson!? John Edwards? No I know- MoveOn.org? The ACLU? PEACE Bunny Colvins last blog post..Chairwoman Mao says Barack is A Gay Drug User

By: Reason

Reason — Thu, 07 Aug 2008 22:27:11 +0000

Of course there will be a terrorist attack on Obama’s watch.

It was Clinton’s lax response to bin Laden’s attacks that gave them the courage to launch such an attack. Even Osama’s own driver’s testimony confirms that. That and lax policies on immigration and border security that sadly continue to this day.

The only clown here is you, you are snide, rude, and generally an ass who does little more than heckle from the peanut gallery. You present nothing to actually debate or argue but merely cast stones at others with little real logic or supporting evidence. Believe me your own ignorance is towering.

By: Bunny Colvin

Bunny Colvin — Thu, 07 Aug 2008 21:42:09 +0000

I ain’t gots no grudge against Scottie. I view him as an expert on countless topics, in fact. He made me look bad in an old post? PLEASE explain. I’m all ears.

Have sex with my mother? Oh, unREASONalbe. I’m the one who had sex with YOUR MOTHER, son. If you werent so d@mn stupid, I might even suspect you were one of my own. Thankfully, it is obvious that you’re not.

And 9/11 being “put into action on Clinton’s watch”. Lets take that a step further. Will you blame W if there is a terrorist attack on American soil under President Obama? Lets say those crafty terr’sts had been planning it since 2004. You gonna blame dubs? Highly doubtful.

You’re such a clown, dude. Your “arguments” make no sense. I’d rather talk to Scottie or Swines. At least they don’t take themselves too seriously.

PEACE

Bunny Colvins last blog post..Chairwoman Mao says Barack is A Gay Drug User

By: Reason

Reason — Thu, 07 Aug 2008 15:10:55 +0000

Bunny you ask after Scott a lot do you have some personal grudge against this person? Did he have sex with your mother or something? Its almost…stalkerish the way you keep asking after a poster who made you look bad in an old post.

You’ve not once refuted Big Dog’s arguments about water boarding. You say “Terrorism is the repubber’s strength” however is was in 1992 that Gore that accused Bush of not being tough enough on Saddam who he then claimed was building nukes…

Oddly enough more terrorist attacks occurred during Clinton’s 8 years than have occurred during Bush’s 7 years, and the worst 9/11 was put into action on Clinton’s watch. I wonder why that is? I wonder why numerous attacks have occurred on foreign soil but none in America…

By: Bunny Colvin

Bunny Colvin — Thu, 07 Aug 2008 05:20:13 +0000

Sometimes reading your arguments would qualify as torture. Where Scottie at, he probably knows a lot about this stuff? PEACE Bunny Colvins last blog post..Chairwoman Mao says Barack is A Gay Drug User

By: Big Dog

Big Dog — Thu, 07 Aug 2008 03:56:29 +0000

It can’t be torture. Congress allows it to be done to our soldiers. Are you saying we can torture our troops but not the enemy?

McCain also said that sleep deprivation and temperature control was torture and it is not. It is uncomfortable but not torture. It is what cops do.

I will worry about some guy feeling like he is drowning when they worry about cutting off people’s heads. Now that is torture.