http://www.onebigdog.net/court-decides-cops-need-no-warrant-to-place-gps-trackers/ "Let that be a lesson to you, boys and girls. Don't ever argue with the Big Dog because the Big Dog is always right" Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:27:03 -0500 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= http://www.onebigdog.net/court-decides-cops-need-no-warrant-to-place-gps-trackers/comment-page-1/#comment-130009 Blake Tue, 12 May 2009 02:04:20 +0000 http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=6491#comment-130009 Don't get me wrong, I am all about supporting the police, but this ruling is flat out ignorant, it infringes on the privacy clause, because the reasoning doesn't work after the first glance, because the court said even if the person is not under suspicion. If a person is not under suspicion, the officer would not be following the person, ergo, the GPS tracker is overtly onerous, and not at all analogous to the situation as expressed in the opinion. It is a constant erosion on our right to privacy to even consider this. Don’t get me wrong, I am all about supporting the police, but this ruling is flat out ignorant, it infringes on the privacy clause, because the reasoning doesn’t work after the first glance, because the court said even if the person is not under suspicion. If a person is not under suspicion, the officer would not be following the person, ergo, the GPS tracker is overtly onerous, and not at all analogous to the situation as expressed in the opinion. It is a constant erosion on our right to privacy to even consider this.

]]>