William Ayers Is Still A Coward
Oct 27, 2008 Political
Back in the 1960s William Ayers, in cowardly fashion, terrorized the nation with his band of misfits and malcontents by bombing buildings and killing police officers. Terrorism is nothing more than cowardice and people who participate in it are nothing more than cowards. It is easy to secretly attack innocent people without any worry that they will fight back. If Ayers and his buddies had any testicular fortitude they would have fought in the open.
Ever since Ayers became cannon fodder for the McCain campaign, William Ayers, the unrepentant terrorist, went into hiding. Rather than face the people who have questions about him, he decided to hide like the wimpy little coward that he is. Ayers’ response to the attention is that it is time for the GOP to get over it. I guess he thinks we should just forget the destruction, injuries, and deaths that he and his peeps caused. In Ayers’ mind, we should probably just get over 9/11.
Ayers is lamenting the attention that he has received since his fellow radical Barack Obama decided to run for the presidency. He cries that he receives endless mention by people like Bill O’Reilly. Ayers certainly wanted attention when he was attacking our government and the people of this nation. Ayers was certainly looking for attention when he declared war on this country and he certainly wanted attention when he was waging that war. He certainly wanted attention when his group devised the plan to blow up soldiers and their dates at Fort Dix. Thank God the bomb blew up and killed some of his people instead of our nation’s heroes.
Because of a technicality, Ayers was never prosecuted. He was jubilant when he said that he was guilty as sin and free as a bird. Yes, only in America.
Ayers slithered into a forum where he was the focus of attention of the 60 or so of the mind numbed Obama followers who came to hear him. The event was not open to reporters because Ayers is a coward. One did manage to sneak in and stated that there were laughs at “spreading the wealth” and the “Republican revolution.” If this appearance was like his others he spent time bashing the country and talking about the evils of capitalism. At the end of the appearance, he slithered out a back door where awaiting reporters were greeted with a “no comment”" as he was whisked away in a cab.
Ayers is a low life, scum sucking coward who attacked this country. The only sadness I have about his people being blown up is that all of them were not in the room went it went boom. It would have been fitting and it would have rid us of this parasite. It would have also prevented him from reproducing.
If Obama is elected and we are tested like Biden says will happen (mark his words), the only real poetic justice will be if that test wipes out Ayers and his family. If McCain is elected maybe the shock will give Ayers a heart attack and he will die a slow and agonizing death.
Just like that coward deserves.
Source:
Breitbart
Get Your Facts Straight Joe, And It Is Socialism
Oct 27, 2008 Political
Joe Biden was interviewed by a reporter from WFTV and he was not happy with the questions that she asked. Unlike most members of the media, this reporter asked tough questions and Biden had a meltdown. She asked about Obama’s ties to ACORN and Biden said that the campaign NEVER gave any money to ACORN. During the questioning he told her to get her facts straight. Well, looks like Joe is the one who has problems with the facts because the campaign did pay ACORN over $800,000 to get out the vote (not set up stages like their reports indicated). This directly contradicts Biden’s assertion that the campaign is responsible for its get out the vote efforts.
The Obama campaign recently admitted that it paid an affiliate of ACORN, the controversial community organizer that Obama represented in Chicago, more than $832,00 for “voter turnout” work during the primaries. The campaign initially claimed the money had been spent on “staging, sound and light” and “advance work.” Newsmax
The reporter asked if Obama’s plan to spread the wealth was Socialism and Biden lost it. The campaign was so upset that someone would dare to ask tough questions that it cancelled an interview with Biden’s wife and the campaign sent a letter stating that the station would get no further interviews.
It is interesting that Joe the Senator would get so upset at these tough questions. Sarah Palin has had to address tough questions that have little relevance to the campaign. How many people know, off the tops of their heads, the Supreme Court rulings by name? The lawyers might know the major ones but that is the kind of question designed to say, “gotcha.” Some advance notice on these kinds of questions is not unreasonable so that the candidate can come prepared. The kinds of questions asked of Joe Biden were reasonable but he lost it. Palin has mangled the answers to some questions and has taken the criticism on the chin and continued on. Who do we want, a cry baby or a person with thick skin who continues on regardless of how tough it gets. Imagine the outcry if the McCain campaign cut off any media outlets. Palin was brought in slowly but she has made more media appearances in the last 60 days than Biden has and Obama has had no press conferences in the last 30. Where are the cries about media access?
Interestingly, Socialism is exactly what Obama wants and he has been pushing that since he was a rabble rouser in Chicago. He was exposed when Joe the Plumber asked about taxes and Obama said that he wanted to spread the wealth. Later, Obama said he did not regret what he had said but one would never know that by the way his surrogates attacked Joe mercilessly. But the idea of wealth redistribution is not a new concept to the Sainted One. In 2001 Barack Obama said that he felt the Supreme Court did not do enough to address Redistribution of wealth during the civil rights movement. Yes, Obama thinks that part of the civil rights movement should have been the court addressing the redistribution of wealth.
No matter how mad Joe Biden gets, no matter how long Obama supporters keep their fingers in their ears screaming nyah, nyah, the fact is he believes in Socialism. Obama, who is supposed to be a Constitutional professor, thinks that our highest court should have addressed the issue of forcefully taking money from one group of people and giving that money to another. Income redistribution is Socialism. Joe Biden can deny it, but it is so.
I guess it should not surprise anyone that Obama believes this. This is the guy who said the Constitution was an imperfect document. In other words, when he swore to protect and defend the Constitution upon taking office as a US Senator, he was either swearing to protect and defend a document he views as flawed or he was indicating that he would only protect and defend the parts he liked.
We already know he does not like the Second Amendment. His anti-gun history is unquestionable and well documented. Obama would be very happy to end gun ownership in America and though that is unlikely, he can certainly make a huge dent in our rights. It also appears that Obama is not too happy with the First Amendment when people say things that he disagrees with or that bring discredit to him and his campaign.
Here is a picture of a person who is willing to give lessons on the Second Amendment.
Redistribution of wealth already takes place in this country. Social Security is a great example. People pay into it each time they earn wages and those funds are sent to people who are already drawing benefits. There is no way that money is put aside in an individual’s name so that it will go to THAT person when he retires. Money is taken from one group and given to another. Now, Democrats want to take over 401(k) plans. The government wants to take away the tax benefits that people get by saving for retirement in a 401(k). The government also wants to FORCE people to submit 5% of their income into a government run retirement program which will be administered by the Social Security Administration. The SSA is poorly run, it is overly bloated, benefits have expanded for all kinds of things for which it was never intended and people do not get to keep their own money. How will it work when you are forced to submit for retirement.
Will government pool all the money like it does with SS so that people who pay little will be given the same benefits as those who pay a lot? Will government rape the newfound money and spend it on what it wants like it did with all the money paid into Social Security? If individual accounts will be set up then why not let us do that with the money that is extorted from us for Social Security? Why is it that privatizing Social Security in individual accounts is bad but government run retirement is OK and will be safe? Why is it that they can set up safe retirement accounts but not set up safe Social Security accounts?
These plans amount to even more socialism and this is what Barack Obama wants to do to this country despite what Joe the Senator says.
America is great because we fought to unshackle ourselves from the oppressive King of England who taxed the living hell out of us. We threw some tea in a harbor and fought a revolution over that.
What we paid then is miniscule compared to what we are forced to pay now. It is time for anther revolution.
We can start by throwing members of Congress in the harbor.
Other source:
Chicago Public Radio Blog
Tags: biden, confiscate wealth, lies, Obama, socialism
Time For A New Theme?
Oct 27, 2008 Political
I have been thinking about a new theme. The old one seemed inefficient and I wanted a new look. I like the one you now see and I think the tabbed widgets in the sidebar make things more tidy.
Please comment and let me know what you think of the theme and if the features in the sidebar work for you.
Chicago Is The Murder Capital
Oct 26, 2008 Political
Chicago is led by a bunch of corrupt politicians who believe that gun control is the answer to the problem of violence. In reality, politicians only want gun control for one reason. If they take away the guns people will no longer have the means to resist. Government becomes tyrannical and people become enslaved when they have no means to exercise their will upon the members of government. People need a means to resist, should government go bad.
In Chicago they have some of the most stringent gun laws in the country and yet their murder rates are above New York and Los Angeles. In fact, Chicago is outpacing all the other US cities for the king of murder title. Of course not all murders are committed with guns. The bulk of them are and the rest might never have been committed had the victim been armed.
Barack Obama is anti-gun, of that there is no doubt. He is running as more moderate than he is (and more moderate than he was in the primary) trying to fool people into believing that he favors individual ownership of firearms but he absolutely does not. Bills that Obama helped pass in Illinois are responsible for the murders taking place in Chicago.
Interestingly, the cities with the highest murder rates have the most stringent gun control and have populations that are overwhelmingly registered as Democrats and whose legislatures are mostly Democrat. Baltimore, New York, Philadelphia, Chicago, and on and on. Everywhere there are dense populations of liberals, run by liberals, you have murder and mayhem.
Criminals do not obey the law. A simple fact that seems to escape liberals and their gun control measures. In places with gun control there is more crime and more murder because criminals do not follow the law. In places where people are allowed to exercise their Second Amendment rights there are few murders and the murders are not committed by the law abiding gun owners.
Keep Chicago in mind when you go into the voting booth. Keep in mind that the police are a reactive force not a proactive. If they showed up before crimes took place we would not need guns but the fact is they show up after crimes have taken place.
We have a name for people who blindly follow anti-gun policies of people like Barack Obama:
Victim.
Tags: chicago, crime, gun control, murder capital, Obama
Did Government Invade Joe’s Privacy?
Oct 25, 2008 Political
Looks like some government officials in Ohio illegally used their government computers to look into the life of Samuel “Joe the Plumber” Wurzelbacher after he dared to ask the Sainted One a question about taxes. When Obama accidentally let it slip that he planned on implementing a Socialist system where everyone “shared the wealth” the media went into overdrive to discredit this average Joe who exposed the Emperor’s nakedness.
Apparently, the media are not the only ones who were digging into Joe’s background.
Public records requested by The Dispatch disclose that information on Wurzelbacher’s driver’s license or his sport-utility vehicle was pulled from the Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles database three times shortly after the debate.
Information on Wurzelbacher was accessed by accounts assigned to the office of Ohio Attorney General Nancy H. Rogers, the Cuyahoga County Child Support Enforcement Agency and the Toledo Police Department.
It has not been determined who checked on Wurzelbacher, or why. Direct access to driver’s license and vehicle registration information from BMV computers is restricted to legitimate law enforcement and government business. Columbus Dispatch
So the government used computers illegally to find out and release information about a private citizen in retaliation for the question that made Joe the Plumber a household name.
I remember early on in the primaries it was disclosed that the passport information of The Messiah Obama was accessed illegally and people lost their jobs because of it. Nothing less will suffice in this situation. In fact, whoever looked at and released the information should be fined and imprisoned for the breech of public trust.
These kinds of Stalinist tactics are what we can look forward to if Barack Hussein Obama becomes our next president. Question government and become a target.
The messiah controls the media and has operatives everywhere. Why else are we not seeing the video of him attending a Jew Bash with a person he denied any close association with (Palestinian operative Rashid Khalidi)?
Tags: invasion of privacy, jew bashing, joe the plumber, Obama, stalinist tactics
Loading ...
Loading... 
