I find it interesting that instead of proving the information to be inaccurate, one would rather just claim it to be incorrect because the author “hates” the subject. Sad, very sad.

I doubt she would have chased after him. She might catch him if she used the same tactics her husband used to bring criminals home; give them a pardon for a huge sum of money. I know, another rumor/lie that has those inconvenient little things called facts in them.

We can look it up.

Hillary will be a disaster to the military. I am willing to bet that she will have to institute a draft because so many will get out if she is elected.

Clearly. If you like the hypothetical, maybe if Hillary would have been president on 9/11 we would have caught bin Laden by now…

You also assume that I defend Bush all the time when the fact is I have taken him to task on many things. I also know that there is a hell of a lot of evidence around about the misdeeds of the Clintons that gets hidden by the media. Take the stolen doc**ents, Clinton had his hands in that but now his wife has the guy advising her.

Clinton led this country through the wealth, prosperity and growth that a Republican led Congress enacted. They forced him to do a lot.

He also sold our secrets and his weakness on terror gave us 9/11. One thing Bush is that Clinton never was or could be and that is a strong defender of our country. If Bush had been president during Clinton’s time there would not have been as many attacks on us because he would have retaliated and it would have stopped.

Think Libya and Reagan bombing them, not another word spoken.

At the end of the day I like the Clinton’s because
all of the things you accuse them of really don’t matter to me as much as they matter to you. For all his personal faults, Clinton lead this nation well and administered over a period of wealth, prosperity, and job growth. Bush, in all his moral character, has done none of that.

Clinton will always be viewed as a better president than Bush, and that drives you crazy…

It is not a matter of me hating her, you attempt to diminish things by making excuses. This one hates her, that one hates her, Vast Right Wing Conspiracy, blah blah. You rationalize based upon your hatred for GWB and Republicans.

It is amazing you would say that my rails against anything Clinton are sad but entertaining but your last 8 years of unhinged lunatic rantings about Bush were rational. Oh yeah, libs can’t be wrong, if they hate the guy he must be Hitler.

Obviously there is no way to prove a negative so I can’t say Hillary would not have made it on her own because, as you state, it cannot be proven. However, I can say, and it is fact, she has gotten where she is based upon her marriage to him and the last name. I might not be able to prove she wouldn’t have done it without them but I can show that it was those things that got her where she is (that and she played the victim greatly).

Funny, I will repeat lies and rumors and they are lies and rumors because you say so and your proof is that things have never been proven etc. And yet, you repeat lies and rumors about Bush, none of which have been proven.

This is that double standard we talk about. If Bush got a hummer in the Oval Office you guys would be calling for his head but you ignored the last one. Clinton said that Hussein had WMD and lobbed missiles in there and went to war in Bosnia without UN approval, you ignore. Bush goes after WMD and he lied (same thing Clinton said and Clinton signed EO calling for regime change) and he goes to Iraq without UN approval and you all cry.

Clinton dodged the draft and you ignore, was an unpopular war and he was a smart guy, too smart to be an idiot soldier. Bush joins the service and people make claims he was AWOL (never proven, or as you call it lies/rumor) and he is castigated. When Clinton did not go it was OK, you understood and military service was not necessary. With Bush you all said he was AWOL and could not serve because he screwed up his military obligation.

Bush had the DUI and there was word of past drug use. Left went nuts and said he was a druggie and a boozer and unfit to serve. Kennedy gets drunk and kills a woman and he is held up in honor, Clinton says he smoked dope but did not inhale and people believe him and say it did not matter anyway, what’s a little drug use back in the 60s?

Double standard. You laugh and my inferior intellect but you did the same thing.

BTW, there are no aspects of Socialism that work. You cannot redistribute wealth and it will not work. Socialized medicine is a violation of the Constitution and it will bankrupt the country. The government has never run any program efficiently or effectively. I know more about health care than damn near anyone of them and I know it will not work.

If they want to get it right they should remove government from the equation and ensure there are no mandates on what can be offered (except emergency, regular visits and surgery) all others are options. Leave it to the states where it belongs. Socialism does not work, even if your God Michael Moore said so, he is wrong (and he owns Halliburton stock).

You can say that Hillary got to where she is today with the help of her husband, but to say Bill was necessary is an idea that cannot be proven either way and is only put out there as a way to attack her with no basis.

The only indisputable fact here is that you hate the Clinton’s so much that you’ll repeat any rumor, any lie, any sleaze against them just so you can continue to rail against them. It’s sad, really, but also very entertaining…

As far as a redistribution of wealth and keeping the poor, poor, the Nazis certainly did that.

I don’t like Socialism, it chokes the life out of productive people and there is not one example of where it has worked. Libs just believe it will work if done right and they are wrong.

Hillary needed her man to get ahead in life. Indisputable fact. She would not be where she is without him and she would not be considered a presidential candidate without him. She uses him to do her fighting and mud slinging and she hides behind him.

It is not sexist to point out a fact. Just because Hillary is a weak woman who needs a man does not make me a sexist. As for her sexual preferences, the rumors are there…

With the Clintons, if the charge is made it is probably true. Web’s daughter knows.

I know this is all just part of your hate the Clinton party, but come on now. You shouldn’t talk like such a sexist pig with the stuff about Hillary “getting out of line” and needing a “man to take care of her” and having to “turn to women.” But maybe calling Hillary a b**** makes you feel like more of a man?

Fortunately, they are aborting themselves to extinction so after this generation of aging hippies dies off we will have fewer to deal with.