An Obama Win Would Be Good For Iran And Bad For Israel

Iranian parliament Speaker Ali Larijani said that Iran would prefer to see Barack Obama win the US presidential election. The statement indicates that Obama is considered more rational and flexible than John McCain. This is coming from the nation that also desires to wipe Israel off the map. It is no coincidence that Iran wants a flexible president so that the country can manipulate him and take advantage in order to attack Israel.

This endorsement comes at a time when Iran is working on plans for a preemptive strike against Israel and God’s chosen people. Iran is not likely to be foolish enough to attack while George Bush is still in office because that country knows Bush will not play games nor will he negotiate without precondition. If Iran attacks, Bush will retaliate and the blow would be devastating.

Iran will wait until the election is over and if their chosen one is elected they will attack Israel after the inauguration. Iran knows that Obama is not a big supporter of Israel and that Joe Biden has said that Israel should get use to a nuclear Iran. Couple this with Jesse Jackson’s statements that support for Israel will decrease in an Obama administration and it is no wonder that Iran is licking its chops at the thought of a rookie at the helm.

This just might be the crisis Biden was talking about.

On another note, Al Qaida said that it wanted John McCain to win so that the continuation of Bush’s policies would drive our economy to even greater depths. This is a veiled endorsement of Obama. Al-Qaida knows that if it endorsed Obama he would lose so they say they want McCain to drive Americans to Obama.

Al Qaida knows that Obama would be a push over compared to McCain and, like its pals in Iran, wants the candidate that it can manipulate. They want the rookie so they can continue to work on America’s demise.

American Jews need to pay special attention to what is going on. A vote for Obama is a vote for appeasement and complacency which will certainly be of dire consequence to Israel.

Big Dog

Print This Post

If you enjoy what you read consider signing up to receive email notification of new posts. There are several options in the sidebar and I am sure you can find one that suits you. If you prefer, consider adding this site to your favorite feed reader. If you receive emails and wish to stop them follow the instructions included in the email.

9 Responses to “An Obama Win Would Be Good For Iran And Bad For Israel”

  1. David Kirk says:

    I think the chances of Iran attacking Israel in an Obama presidency are very good. They will see this as a window of opportunity while the US has a President with no experience, probably an antisemite, certainly Islamic-leaning and who thinks talking is the answer. It’s Jimmy Caarter all over again. Iran declared war on the United States by taking our sovereign territory and Carter did nothing. The US is essentialy the only country that holds regimes like this in check and they know they will get very few opportunities. If Obama gets elected, it will only be for one term, so it will happen rather early. I cannot imagine a Jewish person voting for this man.

  2. Dave says:

    I disagree. If this article is correct, it would behoove Iran to wait a couple years.

    I think the chance of Israel striking Iran before inauguration and after an Obama election is probably more likely.

  3. bruce says:

    thank you jimmy carter for a nuclear armed iran and north korea this is one ex president who needs some tar and feathers.jews voted for carter just like they will vote for the obama fuhrer most of them could care less about israel or america.if bongo wins we are screwed, he and the commiecrats, like bela pelosi and chuckyou schummer,will try and destroy this country.

  4. Patsy says:

    Iran has already started its WMD assault on Israel. They have attempted to make the first strike against Israel. They failed because an Iranian cargo ship owned by the Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines (IRISL), named the MV Iran Deyanat, was hijacked by Somali pirates and the ship & its cargo ransomed.

    The ship which was recently released by pirates off the coast of Somalia was carrying radioactive sand Iran acquired from China. The ship, before it was commandeered by the Somali pirates, was to travel through the Suez Canal and then release its “dirty bomb” by exposion off Israel’s coast in order to kill & sicken thousands of Israelis. Sixteen of the pirates died and many more are deadly sick with radiation poisoning after the unsuspecting pirates broke open a couple of the cargo holds and came in contact with the radioactive contents. You can read the whole story about this at:

    Message to David Kirk I left you a reply on the Barney Frank post.

  5. Dog: Once again your logic fails. As much as you’d like, you can’t have it both ways. Either the Iranians and Al Quiada are telling they truth or they’re both lying. But cherry picking to make each one’s stated purpose fit your purpose is cheating.

  6. Big Dog says:

    Monroe, I just look at it from the enemy’s point of view. Which would be better for them. It is obvious to me they will have an easier time with an Obama presidency. McCain will take the fight to them and they are already being killed off at a high rate.

    The most dangerous thing to be is the #2 guy in Al Qaida…

  7. Adam says:

    I think we don’t really know how Obama will use the military. What if this ego you accuse Obama of having somehow contributes to a trigger happy administration? Other than somehow making Jackson’s opinion the view of Obama, when has Obama not offered his support for Israel?

  8. Patsy says:

    Adam, are you really that misinformed about far-left radicals? They not only don’t believe in military responses, they HATE the military. Obama ain’t gonna do a damn thing to our enemies except excuse their attacks on us and blame US for their bloodshed. Where the hell did you receive your education? Berkley?

  9. Victoria says:

    This is what Barak Obama promised to do regarding our military. It reminds me of a political speech that was given regarding Kerry in 04 where the speaker said something to the effect of, “what does Kerry want our military armed with spit wads??”