<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ABC Is The Barack Network</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onebigdog.net/abc-is-the-barack-network/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/abc-is-the-barack-network/</link>
	<description>"Let that be a lesson to you, boys and girls. Don't ever argue with the Big Dog because the Big Dog is always right"</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:25:29 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrel</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/abc-is-the-barack-network/comment-page-1/#comment-132987</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 02:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=6949#comment-132987</guid>
		<description>BIGD: &quot;The fact is, he is not taking anyone’s money. He is not a freeloader or a mooch.&gt;&gt;

DAR
  Absolutely he is. Everyone else is paying for his premium. Perhaps think about car insurance since there seems to be some difficultly thinking clearly about health insurance.

Everyone else pays more, to cover the tens of millions uninsured (Blake&#039;s group). A person driving without car insurance does the same thing. That&#039;s why we made it legally required.

BIGD: A freeloader is an illegal drawing on the system.&gt;&gt;

DAR
  Blake&#039;s freeloading is legal, for now. Soon it won&#039;t be. It already isn&#039;t in Massachusetts. (I think the Mass. experiment is a disaster btw).

BIGD: A freeloader is a person sitting on the couch drawing welfare.&quot;&gt;&gt;

DAR
  A freeloader is also a person who doesn&#039;t pay for the cost of insuring their health care risk. That&#039;s Blake.

Bigd: A freeloader is a person who accepts government health care when others are paying for it.&gt;&gt;

DAR
  Exactly right. Except, you don&#039;t need the word &quot;government&quot; in there. Actually, it doesn&#039;t matter if you leave it in since the government also steps up and eats a great deal of the cost covering of Blake&#039;s freeloading lifestyle. 

Bigd: Risk is always passed on and that will not stop.&gt;&gt;

DAR
  Not at all. My Allstate premium for car and home insurance covers the cost of my risk, and then some. I know this because Allstate makes money on the deal. People who don&#039;t pay car/home premiums and still expect to reap the benefits, are freeloaders. This is what Blake is doing with healthcare right now. I think he should pay his way and stop freeloading.

Bigd: Because of poor drivers we all pay more. We pay based on risk by age.&gt;&gt;

DAR
  Actually, that is factored in and adjusted for. Poor drivers pay more. Younger, single drivers pay more, etc. Blake doesn&#039;t pay, he just asks that we pay for him should he get seriously sick or hurt. And we will.

Bigd: We pay more if the goat rancher down the street is at high risk.&gt;&gt;

DAR
  This goat rancher down the street pays his full share for his health insurance. Over $600 a month. Blake does not pay. So they charge me more, to pay for his risk.

And I&#039;m really not blaming him. The system is screwed.

BIGD: &quot;There are not 5700 medical bankruptcies a day. The numbers come from skewed data in a study...&gt;&gt;

DAR
  Did you even read your own link? I did. There is nothing in there that even attempts to refute the claim I made!

This is pretty straight forward. Medical bankruptcy in the US is very common and effects thousands of people, every day.

You give a pop news article from a conservative &quot;Investor&quot; magazine with zero reference and it doesn&#039;t address my claim. Try this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pnhp.org/new_bankruptcy_study/Bankruptcy-2009.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Peer reviewed scientific study&lt;/a&gt;.

***
CLINICAL RESEARCH STUDY
Medical Bankruptcy in the United States, 2007: Results of a National Study

BACKGROUND: Our 2001 study in 5 states found that medical problems contributed to at least 46.2% of all bankruptcies. Since then, health costs and the numbers of un- and underinsured have increased, and
bankruptcy laws have tightened.

METHODS: We surveyed a random national sample of 2314 bankruptcy filers in 2007, abstracted their court records, and interviewed 1032 of them. We designated bankruptcies as “medical” based on debtors’ stated reasons for filing, income loss due to illness, and the magnitude of their medical debts.

RESULTS: Using a conservative definition, 62.1% of all bankruptcies in 2007 were medical; 92% of these medical debtors had medical debts over $5000, or 10% of pretax family income. The rest met criteria for
medical bankruptcy because they had lost significant income due to illness or mortgaged a home to pay medical
bills. Most medical debtors were well educated, owned homes, and had middle-class occupations. Three quarters had health insurance. Using identical definitions in 2001 and 2007, the share of bankruptcies attributable to medical problems rose by 49.6%. In logistic regression analysis controlling for demographic factors,
the odds that a bankruptcy had a medical cause was 2.38-fold higher in 2007 than in 2001.

CONCLUSIONS: Illness and medical bills contribute to a large and increasing share of US bankruptcies.

--Department of Medicine, Cambridge Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Mass; Department of Sociology, Ohio University, Athens; and Harvard Law School, Cambridge, Mass

The American Journal of Medicine (2009) 
***

D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BIGD: &#8220;The fact is, he is not taking anyone’s money. He is not a freeloader or a mooch.&gt;&gt;</p>
<p>DAR<br />
  Absolutely he is. Everyone else is paying for his premium. Perhaps think about car insurance since there seems to be some difficultly thinking clearly about health insurance.</p>
<p>Everyone else pays more, to cover the tens of millions uninsured (Blake&#8217;s group). A person driving without car insurance does the same thing. That&#8217;s why we made it legally required.</p>
<p>BIGD: A freeloader is an illegal drawing on the system.&gt;&gt;</p>
<p>DAR<br />
  Blake&#8217;s freeloading is legal, for now. Soon it won&#8217;t be. It already isn&#8217;t in Massachusetts. (I think the Mass. experiment is a disaster btw).</p>
<p>BIGD: A freeloader is a person sitting on the couch drawing welfare.&#8221;&gt;&gt;</p>
<p>DAR<br />
  A freeloader is also a person who doesn&#8217;t pay for the cost of insuring their health care risk. That&#8217;s Blake.</p>
<p>Bigd: A freeloader is a person who accepts government health care when others are paying for it.&gt;&gt;</p>
<p>DAR<br />
  Exactly right. Except, you don&#8217;t need the word &#8220;government&#8221; in there. Actually, it doesn&#8217;t matter if you leave it in since the government also steps up and eats a great deal of the cost covering of Blake&#8217;s freeloading lifestyle. </p>
<p>Bigd: Risk is always passed on and that will not stop.&gt;&gt;</p>
<p>DAR<br />
  Not at all. My Allstate premium for car and home insurance covers the cost of my risk, and then some. I know this because Allstate makes money on the deal. People who don&#8217;t pay car/home premiums and still expect to reap the benefits, are freeloaders. This is what Blake is doing with healthcare right now. I think he should pay his way and stop freeloading.</p>
<p>Bigd: Because of poor drivers we all pay more. We pay based on risk by age.&gt;&gt;</p>
<p>DAR<br />
  Actually, that is factored in and adjusted for. Poor drivers pay more. Younger, single drivers pay more, etc. Blake doesn&#8217;t pay, he just asks that we pay for him should he get seriously sick or hurt. And we will.</p>
<p>Bigd: We pay more if the goat rancher down the street is at high risk.&gt;&gt;</p>
<p>DAR<br />
  This goat rancher down the street pays his full share for his health insurance. Over $600 a month. Blake does not pay. So they charge me more, to pay for his risk.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;m really not blaming him. The system is screwed.</p>
<p>BIGD: &#8220;There are not 5700 medical bankruptcies a day. The numbers come from skewed data in a study&#8230;&gt;&gt;</p>
<p>DAR<br />
  Did you even read your own link? I did. There is nothing in there that even attempts to refute the claim I made!</p>
<p>This is pretty straight forward. Medical bankruptcy in the US is very common and effects thousands of people, every day.</p>
<p>You give a pop news article from a conservative &#8220;Investor&#8221; magazine with zero reference and it doesn&#8217;t address my claim. Try this <a href="http://www.pnhp.org/new_bankruptcy_study/Bankruptcy-2009.pdf" rel="nofollow">Peer reviewed scientific study</a>.</p>
<p>***<br />
CLINICAL RESEARCH STUDY<br />
Medical Bankruptcy in the United States, 2007: Results of a National Study</p>
<p>BACKGROUND: Our 2001 study in 5 states found that medical problems contributed to at least 46.2% of all bankruptcies. Since then, health costs and the numbers of un- and underinsured have increased, and<br />
bankruptcy laws have tightened.</p>
<p>METHODS: We surveyed a random national sample of 2314 bankruptcy filers in 2007, abstracted their court records, and interviewed 1032 of them. We designated bankruptcies as “medical” based on debtors’ stated reasons for filing, income loss due to illness, and the magnitude of their medical debts.</p>
<p>RESULTS: Using a conservative definition, 62.1% of all bankruptcies in 2007 were medical; 92% of these medical debtors had medical debts over $5000, or 10% of pretax family income. The rest met criteria for<br />
medical bankruptcy because they had lost significant income due to illness or mortgaged a home to pay medical<br />
bills. Most medical debtors were well educated, owned homes, and had middle-class occupations. Three quarters had health insurance. Using identical definitions in 2001 and 2007, the share of bankruptcies attributable to medical problems rose by 49.6%. In logistic regression analysis controlling for demographic factors,<br />
the odds that a bankruptcy had a medical cause was 2.38-fold higher in 2007 than in 2001.</p>
<p>CONCLUSIONS: Illness and medical bills contribute to a large and increasing share of US bankruptcies.</p>
<p>&#8211;Department of Medicine, Cambridge Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Mass; Department of Sociology, Ohio University, Athens; and Harvard Law School, Cambridge, Mass</p>
<p>The American Journal of Medicine (2009)<br />
***</p>
<p>D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Dog</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/abc-is-the-barack-network/comment-page-1/#comment-132692</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 01:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=6949#comment-132692</guid>
		<description>You couldn&#039;t kick ass if you had help.  

It is not foolish.  The fact is, he is not taking anyone&#039;s money.  He is not a freeloader or a mooch.  A freeloader is an illegal drawing on the system.  A freeloader is a person sitting on the couch drawing welfare.  A freeloader is a person who accepts government health care when others are paying for it.  A free loader is a person who pays no taxes but gets a &quot;refund&quot;

Risk is always passed on and that will not stop.  Because of poor drivers we all pay more.  We pay based on risk by age.  We pay more if the goat rancher down the street is at high risk.  That is true of everything.

There are not 5700 medical bankruptcies a day.  The numbers come from skewed data in a study conducted by those who want single payer system.

There are not nearly that many, it is all hype.

As usual, you do not know what you are talking about.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article.aspx?id=478857&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Here is an insight into methodology&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You couldn&#8217;t kick ass if you had help.  </p>
<p>It is not foolish.  The fact is, he is not taking anyone&#8217;s money.  He is not a freeloader or a mooch.  A freeloader is an illegal drawing on the system.  A freeloader is a person sitting on the couch drawing welfare.  A freeloader is a person who accepts government health care when others are paying for it.  A free loader is a person who pays no taxes but gets a &#8220;refund&#8221;</p>
<p>Risk is always passed on and that will not stop.  Because of poor drivers we all pay more.  We pay based on risk by age.  We pay more if the goat rancher down the street is at high risk.  That is true of everything.</p>
<p>There are not 5700 medical bankruptcies a day.  The numbers come from skewed data in a study conducted by those who want single payer system.</p>
<p>There are not nearly that many, it is all hype.</p>
<p>As usual, you do not know what you are talking about.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article.aspx?id=478857" rel="nofollow">Here is an insight into methodology</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrel</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/abc-is-the-barack-network/comment-page-1/#comment-132691</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 01:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=6949#comment-132691</guid>
		<description>BIGD: &quot;You are an ass.&quot;

DAR
  No, I kick ass.

How can someone in health care speak so unbelievably foolishly? Oh, cult member. I forgot.

It would not be &quot;on him.&quot; Blake&#039;s risk is passed along to everyone else and adds an average of $1,000 to the yearly premium of every family in America paying for insurance.

Get a clue. He&#039;s a freeloader and a mooch.

Just as he would be if he drove around without car insurance (which he isn&#039;t allowed to do).

Mr. Marlboro man talks tough until he gets emphysema, then he comes riding into town to get care. And we pay.

And as for Joe the Camel?

http://www.notmytribe.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/ad-busters-joe-chemo.jpg

D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BIGD: &#8220;You are an ass.&#8221;</p>
<p>DAR<br />
  No, I kick ass.</p>
<p>How can someone in health care speak so unbelievably foolishly? Oh, cult member. I forgot.</p>
<p>It would not be &#8220;on him.&#8221; Blake&#8217;s risk is passed along to everyone else and adds an average of $1,000 to the yearly premium of every family in America paying for insurance.</p>
<p>Get a clue. He&#8217;s a freeloader and a mooch.</p>
<p>Just as he would be if he drove around without car insurance (which he isn&#8217;t allowed to do).</p>
<p>Mr. Marlboro man talks tough until he gets emphysema, then he comes riding into town to get care. And we pay.</p>
<p>And as for Joe the Camel?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.notmytribe.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/ad-busters-joe-chemo.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.notmytribe.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/ad-busters-joe-chemo.jpg</a></p>
<p>D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrel</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/abc-is-the-barack-network/comment-page-1/#comment-132690</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 01:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=6949#comment-132690</guid>
		<description>BIGD: &quot;..that is what families and property is for.&quot;

DAR
That&#039;s the American health care system? That&#039;s the best we can do? We&#039;re all &quot;one thing away&quot; from an accident, an illness, that will wipe out our families and property? 5700 medical bankruptcies a day. That&#039;s insane.

We don&#039;t allow this with cars. You have to have insurance and you have to have insurance in case someone without insurance hits you. This is because poor people, with little to lose, like to drive around without insurance and let *everyone else* assume the cost of *their* risk. With our health, everyone just floats along until there is an emergency and then people are wiped out and when they run out (which they quickly do), we all, collectively, jump in and carry them (at ridiculous out of network rates).

What&#039;s Blake&#039;s net worth? Doesn&#039;t matter. There are tens of millions like him with a net worth of negative, to $0, to $30k, to $50k. And these are typically the people without insurance because they don&#039;t have much to lose. So they mooch. It&#039;s just like people driving without car insurance except the cost can be far higher. We don&#039;t allow that anymore.

 I was reading yesterday about a young healthy fellow who racked up $25k for tests regarding a headache (could have been an aneurysm I suppose). Come to think of it, I *know* a young healthy fellow who got a staff infection and racked up nearly $30k in days.

How many days does Blake&#039;s family and wealth carry him at $10k a day? Not too far I bet.

D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BIGD: &#8220;..that is what families and property is for.&#8221;</p>
<p>DAR<br />
That&#8217;s the American health care system? That&#8217;s the best we can do? We&#8217;re all &#8220;one thing away&#8221; from an accident, an illness, that will wipe out our families and property? 5700 medical bankruptcies a day. That&#8217;s insane.</p>
<p>We don&#8217;t allow this with cars. You have to have insurance and you have to have insurance in case someone without insurance hits you. This is because poor people, with little to lose, like to drive around without insurance and let *everyone else* assume the cost of *their* risk. With our health, everyone just floats along until there is an emergency and then people are wiped out and when they run out (which they quickly do), we all, collectively, jump in and carry them (at ridiculous out of network rates).</p>
<p>What&#8217;s Blake&#8217;s net worth? Doesn&#8217;t matter. There are tens of millions like him with a net worth of negative, to $0, to $30k, to $50k. And these are typically the people without insurance because they don&#8217;t have much to lose. So they mooch. It&#8217;s just like people driving without car insurance except the cost can be far higher. We don&#8217;t allow that anymore.</p>
<p> I was reading yesterday about a young healthy fellow who racked up $25k for tests regarding a headache (could have been an aneurysm I suppose). Come to think of it, I *know* a young healthy fellow who got a staff infection and racked up nearly $30k in days.</p>
<p>How many days does Blake&#8217;s family and wealth carry him at $10k a day? Not too far I bet.</p>
<p>D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Dog</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/abc-is-the-barack-network/comment-page-1/#comment-132688</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 01:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=6949#comment-132688</guid>
		<description>You are an ass.  The guy pays his own way and if he has a catastrophe then it will be on him.  You speculate about what might happen but he IS NOT on the public dole.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are an ass.  The guy pays his own way and if he has a catastrophe then it will be on him.  You speculate about what might happen but he IS NOT on the public dole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrel</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/abc-is-the-barack-network/comment-page-1/#comment-132687</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 01:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=6949#comment-132687</guid>
		<description>BLK: &quot;you don’t say anything about the unions getting...&quot;

DAR
  Surely you don&#039;t think I read your articles? I try to but when I come across childish insults (which are usually in the title or first sentence) I move onto to something intelligent.

Regarding your lack of health-care, you are a freeloader, living on the health care dole of everyone else who actually pays for insurance. And I am getting a little tired of paying for your risk. You need to pay your own way and stop mooching.

Get sick, get hurt, and you will coming whining, begging, for a handout (potentially a massive one), suddenly seeing the light and glory of &quot;socialism.&quot; And we will pay. And we will pay through the nose. As we already do for you pseudo &quot;rugged individualists&quot; who are all tough until reality comes to town.

D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BLK: &#8220;you don’t say anything about the unions getting&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>DAR<br />
  Surely you don&#8217;t think I read your articles? I try to but when I come across childish insults (which are usually in the title or first sentence) I move onto to something intelligent.</p>
<p>Regarding your lack of health-care, you are a freeloader, living on the health care dole of everyone else who actually pays for insurance. And I am getting a little tired of paying for your risk. You need to pay your own way and stop mooching.</p>
<p>Get sick, get hurt, and you will coming whining, begging, for a handout (potentially a massive one), suddenly seeing the light and glory of &#8220;socialism.&#8221; And we will pay. And we will pay through the nose. As we already do for you pseudo &#8220;rugged individualists&#8221; who are all tough until reality comes to town.</p>
<p>D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrel</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/abc-is-the-barack-network/comment-page-1/#comment-132686</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 00:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=6949#comment-132686</guid>
		<description>Those words are left out because they don&#039;t apply. Ironically, they do apply to you. Well, except for &quot;elitist.&quot; You would probably like to be that too but it really wouldn&#039;t be believable. Too much of a stretch.

Curious how the right has become so opposed to their intellect that they now openly denigrate intelligence and put their ignorance on a pedestal.

D.
----------------
&quot;Then you wake up at the high school level and find out that the illiteracy level of our children are appalling.&quot; 
—George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Jan. 23, 2004</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those words are left out because they don&#8217;t apply. Ironically, they do apply to you. Well, except for &#8220;elitist.&#8221; You would probably like to be that too but it really wouldn&#8217;t be believable. Too much of a stretch.</p>
<p>Curious how the right has become so opposed to their intellect that they now openly denigrate intelligence and put their ignorance on a pedestal.</p>
<p>D.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
&#8220;Then you wake up at the high school level and find out that the illiteracy level of our children are appalling.&#8221;<br />
—George W. Bush, Washington, D.C., Jan. 23, 2004</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/abc-is-the-barack-network/comment-page-1/#comment-132675</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 18:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=6949#comment-132675</guid>
		<description>If Hussein was to limit the malpractice awards, like we already do in Texas (so does California) that would go a long way towards eliminating needless tests done to ensure someone&#039;s backside is covered, but noooooo- he&#039;s a lawyer, so why limit the money attorneys can make? He&#039;s a sick puppy, with no real common sense, and he&#039;s making a bad situation worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Hussein was to limit the malpractice awards, like we already do in Texas (so does California) that would go a long way towards eliminating needless tests done to ensure someone&#8217;s backside is covered, but noooooo- he&#8217;s a lawyer, so why limit the money attorneys can make? He&#8217;s a sick puppy, with no real common sense, and he&#8217;s making a bad situation worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/abc-is-the-barack-network/comment-page-1/#comment-132673</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 18:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=6949#comment-132673</guid>
		<description>yeah, I notice you don&#039;t say anything about the unions getting a pass on health benefit taxes. Must be ok with you that a group gets special dispensations- you&#039;d holler like a stuck goat if this was  a Republican paying off his friends like Hussein does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, I notice you don&#8217;t say anything about the unions getting a pass on health benefit taxes. Must be ok with you that a group gets special dispensations- you&#8217;d holler like a stuck goat if this was  a Republican paying off his friends like Hussein does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake</title>
		<link>http://www.onebigdog.net/abc-is-the-barack-network/comment-page-1/#comment-132672</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 18:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebigdog.net/?p=6949#comment-132672</guid>
		<description>Yes- but we are right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes- but we are right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

