Big Dogs House

Not Intended For Public Release; Ya Think?

by Big Dog on May 16, 2012 at 12:42 Posted in Political Leave a comment

When the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) was passed by Congress there was a lot of buzz about the parts that authorize the military to detain American citizens if they are suspected of anything that can be linked to terrorism. This could include unknowingly patronizing a business that is involved in terror.

The government said not to worry because the Act did not authorize any such thing but they were disingenuous. The Act does not require the military to detain citizens but it does not prohibit it from doing so. Therefore, the military could detain citizens if directed to do so.

Many in Congress, even alleged conservatives, deny all of this and justify their votes by saying that those who make such claims are not playing with a full deck.

Perhaps.

Then again, an Army publication was inadvertently released and in it there are instructions on how to reeducate people whose views differ from that of the government. The publication discusses political activists (prisoners) and how to indoctrinate them, how to segregate them and how to silence them. The manual’s instructions are intended for use on those overseas as well as American citizens here at home. The instructions discuss identifying the detained by Social Security Numbers and contain other language that definately applies to people here at home.

When asked about this an Army spokesperson stated that the manual was not intended for public release and that the instructions only apply to overseas operations. The words in the manual show that the part of the statement that indicates it is only for overseas is an absolute lie. The part about them not intending to release it to the public is most definitely true.

The government would rather you not know that it has plans to detain citizens and that it has instructions for the military to work as a police force to carry out these plans.

Now is the time for increased vigilance…

Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.

Tags: army, detain, fema, lies, reeducate

You Know What They Say About Karma

by Big Dog on May 15, 2012 at 12:18 Political Leave a comment

It is a female dog…

Chris Matthews of MSNBC thinks he is a smart man and he loves to discuss the intelligence of people he does not like. He spent a lot of time discussing Sarah Palin and how smart he thought she was. Suffice it to say, he has a low opinion of her intelligence.

Matthews made a number of references to Palin and the game show Jeopardy discussing how poorly Palin would do on that show.

Chris Matthews was recently a contestant on Jeopardy and he did terribly. He got some simple basic questions wrong and ended up with $2,300, lowest among the contestants.

Newsbusters has a wrap up of the show and how poorly Matthews did including a sampling of the answers provided and the questions Matthews asked (the format for Jeopardy). If Matthews had not insulted Sarah Palin and questioned how she would do on Jeopardy (at least 4 different times) then Matthews’ performance would not be an issue.

However, since Matthews often questions the intelligence of others and has specifically questioned how Palin would do on the game show this is an issue with which Matthews should be ridiculed.

The only thing that would be better than Matthews demonstrating how moronic he is would be to see Palin on the show with a score higher than old tingle leg.

Here is theme song for Chris…

Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.

Tags: chris matthews, intelligence, jeopardy, karma, sarah palin

Moonbeam Reports Greater Budget Deficit

by Big Dog on May 14, 2012 at 12:23 Political Leave a comment

In January, Governor Moonbeam Brown of California reported a budget deficit of 9.2 BILLION dollars. After the important month of April, the month that taxes owed must be paid, the deficit is much worse. The deficit for California is 16 BILLION dollars.

California is a huge state with lots of very wealthy people and yet it has budget problems. Part of that is because the wealthy liberal elites like to talk about tax increases or paying more but they find ways not to actually do that.

Another part of the problem is that California is a welfare state and it is a sanctuary state. California has a lot of people sucking at the teat of government and quite a few of them are illegal aliens.

Governor Moonbeam is worried that he will have to make cuts from social services and from the state employees if, wait for it, tax increases are not approved by voters.

Why would voters approve tax hikes when the government has shown time and again that it is not capable of managing a budget? Why would people vote to pay more into a corrupt system that has demonstrated it is not capable of cutting spending of managing programs? Why would anyone want to pay more in taxes to support a growing population of welfare recipients and illegal aliens (also known as new Democrat voters)?

Moonbeam Brown needs to cut, cut, and cut.

Why worry if you are not in California? If voters reject tax increases how long will it be before California becomes too big to fail and is bailed out with tax dollars from the rest of the country?

Maybe the voters should approve a tax increase on all wealthy liberal actors. They should have to pay 90% of their salaries in taxes to help the state out.

Want to bet the “please tax us more” liberal actors would be screaming bloody murder and looking for ways to hide their assets.

Want to bet they would be looking to move to a more tax friendly state?

Pay close attention America. California’s economic woes are a sentinel event that portends the future of the country. Moonbeam is doing there what Obama and the rest of our “leaders” are doing at the national level.

The result of liberals in charge is always higher deficits, more welfare and higher taxes.

Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.

Tags: budget deficit, california, governor brown, liberals, lies, moonbeam, taxes

Be Prepared, Be Very Prepared

by Big Dog on May 11, 2012 at 08:48 Political 1 Comment

Why do you think the government is purchasing millions of rounds of ammunition? Why are prices going up? Why do they not work to keep energy prices down? Why are they not actually doing anything to solve the economic and unemployment problems?

They need as much civil unrest as possible in order to keep Barack Hussein Obama (mmm, mmm, mmm) in power so the transformation of America can be completed.

Progressives from both parties want the collapse of America and one world order. They want a single currency and they want to have us under their thumbs. They have been incrementally taking our rights while we sat back and ignored them. Now we happily allow them to grope us before we fly. We allow them to stop us on the streets. We allow them to creep into our personal business.

Soon, very soon, all hell will break loose and they will look to squash us and silence any resistance. They believe they are like the Borg and that resistance is futile.

Metaphorically speaking, there’s a revolution going on in the U.S., propped up by three legs. Economic chaos, chaos through racial division, and chaos through class division, all joined by one core element: Barack Hussein Obama and his stable of unelected czars. Obama is using the lessons learned in 1968 as the template for 2012, and many of those who were active in the late 1960s are now calling the shots for 2012.

“The Obama administration and many of the un-elected ‘czars,’ either directly or indirectly, are engaged in covert activities with the occupy movement, various labor protests, and other subversive activities inside the U.S.,” stated my source. Using untracked campaign funds, they are paying people to infiltrate the various movements to cause physical destruction of property and disrupt commerce. That began last year, but has increased ten-fold already this year,” stated this source. He added that they are using some lower level DHS agents to make the payments under the context of tracking subversives, but they are the unwitting subversives. “It’s like Fast & Furious” but in the social realm,” he added.

“Obama is using some high profile people as pawns to foment the revolution. I heard several times through very credible sources that [Louis] Farrakhan is on the CIA payroll. Other have been named as well, but I’m not prepared to identify them yet. Farrakhan is to coordinate the Blacks and the Muslims to prepare for riots this summer, using any means necessary.” Canada Free Press

Be prepared because the time will come for you to keep you and your family safe and fed. Be prepared because they want you and everyone else to scream for federal and UN intervention.

Why do you think they got a GPS position for every house during the Census? Our folks would know how to find a street but would a foreign soldier acting on behalf of the UN?

Prepare for the worst and pray for the best.

Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.

Tags: civil unrest, civil war, dhs, Obama, occupy, planned attack, un

Why Did Obama Come Out Of The Closet?

by Big Dog on May 10, 2012 at 12:23 Political 1 Comment

Barack Obama announced his support for gay marriage yesterday after his hand was “forced” by his gaffe prone VP, Joe Biden. Over the weekend Biden expressed support for gay marriage and the media frenzy began until Obama was “forced” to address the issue.

Obama claims his opinion on the issue has evolved and that discussions with gay people, his wife and children helped him evolve on the issue. While it might be true that he spoke with them about the issue it had nothing to do with evolving.

Obama has always supported gay marriage. Actually, he has said he does and that he doesn’t and that he does. It all depended on the time and the audience. Rather than evolving it would be more accurate to say Obama’s opinion has been revolving because he keeps going round and round on it.

Obama has always supported gay marriage. He just has not always voiced that support.

In fact, the announcement of this evolution is something that has been ongoing as he and his aides discussed whether he should announce it or not before the election (more flexibility after) and if before, when would be the best time politically? Obama wanted the announcement to provide the biggest bang for the buck, so to speak.

In just 90 minutes after his announcement he received a million dollars in donation from the gay activists. Of course, the obligatory fundraising email went out last night.

Obama is an opportunist. He planned on “evolving” all along but wanted to wait until after the election. He is in a tough fight so he wanted to get the gay community and his liberal base back in the fight. The African American community is strongly against gay marriage but Obama has little to worry about as many will vote Democrat no matter what and many who don’t vote or like his positions will go out and vote for him just because he is black. That is a fact that many blacks have already made public. There are some who question whether Obama will get that support though.

Obama risks losing more of the Independent voters who are not in favor of gay marriage. Obama risks losing those in the majority of states that have already rejected gay marriage.

This is all a political stunt. Obama has always believed in gay marriage. He knows that gay issues (like marriage) are part of the tactics used to brainwash a nation and make it Communist.

He wants this to happen but he wanted to wait until after the election and he would have had Biden not opened his mouth.

Obama, always the politician, has left himself some wiggle room. He announced that he is in favor of gay marriage BUT that he supports the concept of states deciding the issue.

He can pander to his base for votes and cash while making the blatantly obvious point that this IS a state’s rights issue.

Then again so was abortion before the federal government involved itself.

Obama would love nothing more than for a court to decide that gay marriage is a federal issue and conjure up a right out of thin air like it did with abortion. He would love for a court to say that all states have to honor the marriage of a gay couple that was legally performed in a state that allows it. It would be his way of using the backdoor (pun intended) to get gay marriage in all states.

Funny, Obama would oppose any legislation that would allow a concealed carry permit to be recognized in all states.

For now though, he will have to be content to state his support of an issue that he cannot possibly affect because, as he said, it is an issue that is up to each state.

Pandering at its finest.

And the gays will swallow this hook, line, and sinker…

The Washington Post has a good editorial.

As for me, I don’t have anything against gay people. I have an issue with the attempt to redefine marriage. And let us remember, there is no right to marry…

Cave canem!
Never surrender, never submit.

Tags: campaign, deceit, evolving, gay marriage, gays, lies, money, Obama, pandering, revolving